MEP's report seeks tougher restrictions on stem cell research than Commission proposals

October 28, 2003

Brussels, Oct 2003

German MEP Peter Liese, the European Parliament's rapporteur on new proposals for the EU funding of embryonic stem cell research, will argue for a more restrictive approach than that foreseen by the Commission when he publishes his report in early November.

While the Commission envisages EU funding for projects that aim to create new stem cell lines from frozen embryos created for IVF purposes before June 2002, Mr Liese's plan would only allow research to be carried out using existing stem cell lines created before August 2001.

Furthermore, Mr Liese would like to see priority given to projects that aim to carry out research using adult stem cells.

Details of the proposals contained in the draft report were outlined to journalists at a press conference in Strasbourg, France, on 22 October. A vocal opponent of embryonic stem cell research, Mr Liese stated that there are compelling reasons to completely exclude this type of activity from the EU's research programmes, but accepted that such a position would be unlikely to produce a political agreement.

In drafting his proposals, Mr Liese drew extensively on US guidelines for public funding of stem cell research where, similarly, scientists must work with stem cell lines procured before 7 August 2001. Mr Liese's argument is that stem cells from those lines used by publicly funded researchers in the US can be sent to Europe for use in EU projects.

'This compromise represents a very great concession by opponents of embryonic stem cell research to its supporters,' concluded Mr Liese.

CORDIS RTD-NEWS / © European Communities

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns