Legal loophole lets students claim extra cash

February 21, 2008

A mistake in the legislation governing student grants means that thousands of students could be eligible to claim more than £1,000 in extra maintenance support that they were not supposed to be entitled to.

According to the Government's stated policy, students from households earning between £,120 and £38,330 may claim grants of between £50 and £1,230 on a sliding scale according to family income.

But an error in the Student Support Regulations, which came into effect in March 2007, means that all students whose parental income falls into this bracket are entitled to the full £1,230 grant.

The error was discovered by David Willetts, Conservative Shadow Secretary for Higher Education, who accused the Department of Innovation, Universities and Skills of incompetence. "Last week we discovered that the DIUS was paying maintenance costs to prisoners. This week we found out that they can't even write a regulation for receipt of the maintenance grant that matches their official policy."

Mr Willetts added that grant applicants "would have a strong legal case against the Government" if they were not given the full £1,230.

Gemma Tumelty, president of the National Union of Students, suggested that students should try to claim the extra cash. "Students should claim whatever financial support they are entitled to. Given the prospect of increased graduate debt, they cannot be blamed for seeking the greatest support available."

A DIUS spokesperson said: "Local authorities use the guidance to make student finance decisions. None has raised any concerns over the regulations."

A new student financial support package is due to come into effect from September.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns