Jargon poses no real threat, finds new study

February 25, 2010

The academy has long fretted over the use of government buzzwords and business jargon when discussing the rarefied world of higher education.

But it seems they can now stop worrying about the effect this has on university life.

A study found that government policy documents were littered with references to the "commodification" of higher education. But it concluded that they also often opposed the marketisation of universities.

In a doctorate completed at the Institute of Education, Darryll Bravenboer, head of employer-led curriculum development at Middlesex University, looked at texts including government White Papers and Quality Assurance Agency documents. He found that "descriptions that position higher education as a commodity are generally in a dynamic relationship with other types of descriptions".

For example, the Schwartz report on fair admissions to higher education, conducted by Steven Schwartz, the former vice-chancellor of Brunel University, describes higher education as a "commodity", but also makes clear that institutions should have the freedom and autonomy to decide what this concept means, Dr Bravenboer said.

"While a superficial reading of the Schwartz report could quite reasonably conclude that it operated to reinforce the idea that higher education is a commodity, I have found that official texts operate in a more complex and strategic way," he said.

"Even where a text explicitly uses the language of the market and commodification, it may primarily be operating to resist it."


You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns