Institutions hold trump cards in widening access

January 18, 2002

Opening higher education to under-represented social groups is perhaps the government's top priority for universities. It is a desirable goal with which, as Conservative spokesman Alistair Burt says, "none of us disagrees". But it is not easy to attain. University education has replaced land and lineage as the key to a comfortable life, and those already doing well invest heavily - via house prices or private fees - to secure their children's access to it. With places rationed because of cost, that determination results in today's social distortion.

This suggests the answer is to cut unit costs so that supply can be allowed to expand. When this was done in Poland ten years ago ( THES , December 21), student numbers almost quadrupled and opportunities became markedly more equal. Both policies are now in place in Britain. Fee and grant policies, however contentious, have cut costs to the taxpayer and expansion is back with the government's 50 per cent target.

Now to make it happen. Some responsibility rests with the government - for secondary education and support for poor students. But there is much higher education can do. To coincide with this week's National Audit Office reports, The THES has looked at those universities that do best at attracting poorer students to see if high dropout rates are a necessary corollary (they are not) and if some institutions do better than others at retaining such students (they do). What emerges is that those most successful are coherently managed for the benefit of students with consistent policies for support, remedial work and flexibility across the institution; with attention paid to staff training and teaching skills; and with opportunities provided for those staff who are good at research. This suggests that imposing diversity in the form of tiering, with research concentrated in a few institutions while others pursue the "access agenda", is not the answer. It would make social polarisation within the university system yet harder to shift. Instead the solution seems to lie with individual universities' management. Developing and implementing consistent and coherent policies across an institution is no easy business and may be unpalatable to many in higher education. It looks, however, like the least worst solution.

Guide to THES access elite stories

   Scaling the heights: THES access elite table
  Poor face a steep climb
  Jacks of all trades pave the  way to participation
  Sheffield Hallam university
  Strathclyde university
  Stirling university
  Institutions attacked for bias against poor
  Hard-up white men continue to elude recruiters
  US offers cash to lure poor to college

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns