India collaborations need to address ‘practical barriers’

Work between the UK research councils, Indian government and business can be improved by fixing practical barriers to collaboration, a report says.

August 17, 2013

 

Since 2008, Research Councils UK and the government of India have together invested over £100 million in joint research programmes.

Overall the report finds that researchers are positive about their experiences of research collaboration with each other and with their non-academic partners.

But the research, which draws on interviews with researchers and programme directors as well as publicly available data, finds that about half of the projects undertaken through the partnership had experienced serious issues with access to data or access to people.

Examples included visa problems, change of personnel in key positions or delays in hiring postdoctoral researchers.

The report recommends that provision for researcher exchange and industry partnership (such as visa permissions for PhD student visits to industry laboratories) be arranged at the outset of programmes and that allocation and release of funds be done in parallel in the UK and India to allow research to start on time.

A “major obstacle” also identified is negotiations over access to data and agreement on terms of data use, particularly in projects funded by the Natural Environment Research Council and the Indian Ministry of Environment and Earth Sciences, says the report.

However conflict of interest and problems with sharing of intellectual property were not generally identified as barriers to research progress, it adds.

Enhancing collaboration between research and industry was produced by independent researcher Sally Daultrey on behalf of Research Councils UK India, which represents the seven UK Research Councils, and is based at the British High Commission in New Delhi.

The report also recommends further investigation of how and why business and industry benefit from partnerships and that joint UK-India research programmes should be linked to industry and government “technology roadmaps”, such as in nuclear energy or digital economy, to enhance collaboration.

The report also highlights the importance of sustained research partnerships, which require establishing long-term relationships through direct interaction, including informal meetings.

Half the respondents surveyed for the report said that their research collaboration began through an informal connection (eight had very long-standing research relationships in India that were leveraged to respond calls) while half of the projects were paired at RCUK–Government of India workshops.

RCUK-Government of India collaborations cover seven themes: nuclear energy and engineering, water and climate, chronic disease, renewable energy, sustainable crop production, materials science and fuel cells and next-generation networks.

As of January 2013, the partnership supported more than 283 principal and co-investigators working with more than 60 businesses and industry groups, the report says.

elizabeth.gibney@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Post-doctoral Research Associate in Chemistry

University Of Western Australia

PACE Data Support Officer

Macquarie University - Sydney Australia

Associate Lecturer in Nursing

Central Queensland University
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham