GM crops can reduce poverty in the developing world, reports claim

June 12, 2003

Brussels, 11 Jun 2003

Genetically modified (GM) crops have the potential to improve agricultural processes, increase food security and reduce poverty in developing world, according to two recently published reports.

The first study, produced for the International Council for Science (ICSU), is entitled 'new genetics, food and agriculture: scientific discoveries - social dilemmas'. It examines question relating to GM crops such as who needs them and will they affect trade.

The report concludes that 'the broad range of modern genetics applications in agriculture could contribute more toward improving the efficiency and sustainability of agriculture in emerging economies.'

'Genetically modified crops also offer promise to contribute more toward both food security and poverty reduction,' the report continues, and it suggests that public-private partnerships are the most likely source of new varieties of crops aimed at addressing problems in the developing world.

The second study is a draft discussion paper produced by the UK's Nuffield Council on Bioethics, and its purpose is to assess the potential risks and benefits associated with the use of GM crops in developing countries.

The main findings of the report state: '[T]he use of GM crops can, in some circumstances, have considerable potential to increase yields of crops, thereby improving agricultural practice and the livelihood of poor people in developing countries.'

The Nuffield Council feels there is 'an ethical obligation to explore these benefits responsibly' and argues that 'there is not enough evidence of actual or potential harm to justify a moratorium on either research, field trials, or the controlled release of GM crops into the environment at this stage'.

'We therefore affirm the recommendation [...] that genuinely additional resources be committed by governments, the European Commission and others, to fund a major expansion of public GM related research into tropical and sub tropical staple foods, suitable for the needs of small-scale farmers,' concludes the Nuffield Council report.

To read the reports, please consult the following web addresses:
http://www.icsu.org/index2.htm?http& &&www.icsu.org/events/index.html


http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/publica tions/pp_0000000017.asp

CORDIS RTD-NEWS / © European Communities

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns