DNA courts doubt

February 20, 1998

The fate of countless defendants may depend on the way in which DNA evidence is presented to a jury, says Jonathan Koehler, associate professor of behavioural decision-making at the University of Texas at Austin.

He gave the same DNA evidence to two groups of mock jurors, in one case presenting the DNA statistics using probabilities (0.1 or 0.01 per cent) to highlight a suspect's chance of matching by coincidence. In the other case the statistics were presented as frequencies (one in 1,000 and one in a billion) in a way that brought out the chance that others would match by coincidence. In the first case 56 per cent of jurors thought the defendant was 99 per cent likely to be source of the DNA. This fell to 10 per cent in the second group.

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments