Criticism of student attitude at Harvard sparks outcry

John Gill reports on a debate in cyberspace about the culture at America's privileged seat of learning

August 14, 2008

When a former lecturer lifted the lid on life in Harvard University's faculty of social science, a picture emerged of grade inflation, insecure working conditions and students bloated by a sense of "entitlement".

John H. Summers, writing in Times Higher Education, said the majority of the "post-pubescent children of notables" he taught for six years "embraced the perspectives of the rich, the powerful and the unalienated... with appalling ease".

His comments provoked a reaction little short of international outrage, with Harvard students, graduates, faculty and others debating his points across cyber-space.

As the debate spread as far as The Boston Globe, blog website Gawker and online gossip sites such as IvyGate.com, it seemed that hell hath no fury like a Harvard student scorned.

"He obviously has an axe to grind," rages one recent graduate of Harvard on Times Higher Education's website. "Shame on you, Summers, for not caring enough about your students to get to know more than half of an amazing group of people."

In fact, Mr Summers had been careful to acknowledge the "many fine exceptions" to the criticisms made in his original article, although that caveat passed many posters by.

Nevertheless, his piece did offer a blistering assessment of the culture at Harvard, which is consistently rated the best university in the world.

"I am sorry that there are rich, spoiled kids at Harvard, I am sorry that you have, or had, no money. I don't have any money either," another of the many to take offence writes.

"I am sure you are slightly richer for writing this incredibly irresponsible piece, and I suppose you sleep at night thinking your former students deserve this kind of critique.

"No, not all Harvard students are great, or moral, or hardworking. But that's not because we're Harvard students, it's because we're students, and we like to have fun, too.

"We're not all responsible yet, but we will be, and you blaming us for capitalism, greed, the anti-intellectualism of the world beyond Harvard - those are the sins of the father."

Mr Summers responds in another post on the Times Higher Education website by insisting that he was aiming a blow against "intellectual laziness", a point he says he stands by.

Denying the suggestion that he was bitter or resentful towards his former employer, he says such accusations are a "cheap method of slapping down dissent... practised by irresponsible gossips who know nothing about me, yet find it more convenient to imagine my personal faults than to grapple with my argument."

So far, Harvard itself has been silent on the matter, not responding to Times Higher Education's invitation to respond in full to the debate.

For more on the debate, see: http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/News-and-Analysis/All-the-privileg...

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford will host a homeopathy conference next month

Charity says Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford is ‘naive’ to hire out its premises for event

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham