Coreper's report on placing foods and food ingredients derived from GM maize line Mon 863 on the market as novel foods under Regulation 258/97 (link)

October 17, 2005

Brussels, 14 October 2005

Full text of Document 13183/05
Suite of documents 13183/05

12 October 2005 (13.10)

REPORT from: COREPER dated: 10 October 2005 to: COUNCIL No. Cion prop.: 12197/05 Subject: Proposal for a Council Decision authorising the placing on the market of foods and food ingredients derived from genetically modified maize line MON 863 as novel foods or novel food ingredients under Regulation (EC) No 258/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council
COMMON GUIDELINES
Consultation deadline: 21.10.2005

1. The purpose of the above proposal is to authorise the placing on the market of foods and food ingredients produced from genetically modified maize line MON 863.

2. The request for authorisation, which was submitted before the entry into force of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 on genetically modified food and feed, was processed in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 258/97 concerning novel foods.

On 19 May 2005, despite a positive opinion from the European Food Safety Authority on this transgenic maize, and validation of the detection method by the Joint Research Centre, the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health was not able to deliver an opinion on the request.

3. On July 2005 the Commission therefore submitted the planned measure to the Council, which has three months from that date in which to act by a qualified majority.

[...]

[Public Info Net automatically generates links to Council Register documents where an appropriately formatted document number is given. However, the document may not be available for public use and/or it may not be loaded on the Council Register yet.]

Council Register Previous Item Back to Titles Print Item

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns