Controversy over NZ grant panel process

October 13, 2006

A leading New Zealand research fund is to bar members of its grant-awarding panels from receiving its cash after complaints that NZ$6 million (£2.1 million) of this year's NZ$39 million went to projects with which panellists were associated.

Don MacRaild, professor of history at the Victoria University of Wellington and one of several unsuccessful applicants who criticised the fund, described the panel process as "absolutely appalling". "If I were marking their performance, I'd put 'come and see me' on their work," he said.

"There's this idea of abjuring yourself when you leave the room, but I just don't think panels should be awarding themselves money."

Opposition Science Spokesman Paul Hutchison described a NZ$465,000 project to research the cultural history of sex and the orgasm as "nebulous sex studies" and demanded scrutiny of the "disturbing" grant to a lesbian academic and fund panellist. His claims prompted Prime Minister Helen Clark to request a report on the fund's procedures.

The Marsden Fund was set up in 1994 to support ideas-driven research on the basis of excellence rather than potential socioeconomic benefits. Citation rates for Marsden research are significantly higher then average, and an Auckland University study indicated that 44 per cent of patents over a three-year period (2000-02) at the university came from Marsden-funded research.

Of 932 proposals this year, 78 were given the go-ahead.

Garth Carnaby, chair of the Marsden Fund council, said robust systems were in place to ensure that panellists took no part in decisions on their own applications. He acknowledged that they could mark down competing proposals, but said analysis showed that if applicant panellists'

contributions were ignored, it made no difference to the final outcomes.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns