Cash for quantitative and qualitative change

October 18, 2012

A £15.5 million fund aimed at promoting the teaching of quantitative social science has been unveiled.

Departments or groups of departments will be able to bid for up to £350,000 a year over the next five years to establish one of up to 15 specialist centres aimed at providing quantitative skills training for social science undergraduates.

The programme - announced on 18 October - is the brainchild of philanthropic funder the Nuffield Foundation, which is providing £5.5 million.

Pledges of £5 million each have been secured from the Economic and Social Research Council and the Higher Education Funding Council for England.

The paucity of quantitative skills possessed by UK social science graduates is lamented in a position statement, Society Counts, published today by the British Academy.

Writing in this week's Times Higher Education, Ian Diamond, vice-chancellor of the University of Aberdeen and chair of the British Academy High Level Strategy Group on Quantitative Skills, discusses the problem. He says that the sidelining of quantitative skills teaching and the scarcity of academics qualified to provide it means that the majority of social science graduates leave UK universities with inadequate quantitative methods - to the dismay of employers.

Paul Boyle, chief executive of the ESRC, agreed that "a substantial programme of work is required to lead to a major step change in capacity in quantitative methods".

Departments from all areas of social science except economics and experimental psychology are eligible to apply for the funding.

Applications will close in February 2013, with winning bids announced in May. Proposed activities could include the development of courses focused on quantitative methods or the provision of bursary-funded vacation training and work placements.

Sir Alan Langlands, chief executive of Hefce, said the funding council's involvement in the programme was an early response to the evidence the government has tasked it with gathering on strategically important and vulnerable subjects.

"It builds on the extra support we have announced during the past year for the highest-cost (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) subjects, for demand-raising in modern languages ... and for postgraduate taught programmes," he said.

paul.jump@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Felipe Fernández-Armesto takes issue with a claim that the EU has been playing the sovereignty card in Brexit negotiations

Female professor

New data show proportion of professors who are women has declined at some institutions

John McEnroe arguing with umpire. Tennis

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman explain how to negotiate your annual performance and development review

Man throwing axes

UCU attacks plans to cut 171 posts, but university denies Brexit 'the reason'

opinion illustration

Eliminating cheating services, even if it were possible, would do nothing to address students’ and universities’ lack of interest in learning, says Stuart Macdonald