Awards and protests highlight opposing views of nanotechnology

December 13, 2004

Brussels, 10 Dec 2004

On the same day that the German government allocated million euro in prize money to young researchers working in nanotechnology, protesters disrupted a nanotechnology business conference in the UK.

The German funding went to 17 young researchers, who will now establish their own research groups. The projects to be pursued by the recipients address many different nanotechnology applications, for example in materials research, chemistry, biology and electronics.

Announcing the awards, German Secretary of State from the Ministry for Education and Research Wolf-Michael Catenhusen claimed that the initiative has helped the country to combat brain drain. Two of the recipients are non-Germans, while a further six cancelled plans to move abroad because of the funding.

While the praises of nanotechnology were being sung in Berlin, campaigners opposed to nanotechnology expressed concerns to delegates at the 'Nanotechnology - delivering business advantage' conference in Buckinghamshire, the UK, over a number of issues related to nanotechnology. The main points raised were the toxicity of nanoparticles; military use of nanotechnologies; increases in control and surveillance using nanosensors; patents on matter; and circumventing disability rights. For information on the EU's nanotechnology research activities, please visit: http:///

CORDIS RTD-NEWS / © European Communities
Item source: http:/// ALLER=NHP_EN_NEWS&ACTION=D&SESSION=&RCN= EN_RCN_ID:23057

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns