Taking the lead

August 18, 2016

The need to “build bridges” in the right places is key to future success for many universities (“Could accepting a Poppleton view of the campus build bridges?”, News, 4 August). However, the academic-administrative bridge is not the only connecting interface that might need attention. Better connecting the university to the city region, fostering university-industry collaboration, excelling at interdisciplinary research, building multi-university collaborations and developing strategically significant international partnerships are all important bridges that might need work. An inability to prioritise the important things risks focusing on too much with too little, creating a scattergun effect that can suck in resources and produce systemic mediocrity.

A risk in responding to external threat or opportunity is that institutions become fragmented and trapped in silos. This privileges tribal behaviour. It accentuates the divides between academics and administrators and pits units against each other in a fight for resources while the overarching purpose of the university is obscured.

It is bridge-building leaders who are able to produce the conditions in which independence and interdependence can successfully co-exist and flourish.

I have observed these bridge-building leaders at work. They talk about fostering a “one university approach” in which all staff need to be focused upon the purpose and strategic priorities of the university. They talk about the connections that need to be made throughout their institutions. They are not obsessed with power, control and vanity but focus on helping their institutions to make a positive difference on the world. They talk about the university as an agent of societal and economic improvement and public good. They celebrate world-changing research and student learning and achievement. They abhor mediocrity. This selfless but focused approach to leadership seems to be far more effective at winning hearts and minds than any amount of clever oratory, spin or rhetoric.

As universities clarify their purpose they are likely to need more bridge-builders to connect things up and make things work.

Richard Sharpe
Director, Elementa Leadership, Swindon


Send to

Letters should be sent to: THE.Letters@tesglobal.com
Letters for publication in Times Higher Education should arrive by 9am Monday.
View terms and conditions.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (29 June 2017)

Academics who think they can do the work of professional staff better than professional staff themselves are not showing the kind of respect they expect from others

As the pay of BBC on-air talent is revealed, one academic comes clean about his salary

A podium constructed out of wood

There are good reasons why some big names are missing from our roster

Senior academics at Teesside University put at risk of redundancy as summer break gets under way

Thorns and butterflies

Conditions that undermine the notion of scholarly vocation – relentless work, ubiquitous bureaucracy – can cause academics acute distress and spur them to quit, says Ruth Barcan