Digital watchmen

November 5, 2015

I cannot be the only reader who felt a sense of profound gratitude on reading of the efforts of Gavin McLachlan, chief information officer and librarian at the University of Edinburgh, to help academics such as myself to juggle the competing demands of teaching, research and administration (“Marking an essay? Big Brother may be watching...”, News, 29 October). His commitment to aiding us in our attempts to achieve “excellence” in our marking and assessment activities, via a process of rigorous digital surveillance, is to be warmly welcomed. I can only join Phil Richards, chief innovation officer at Jisc, in lamenting the prospect that some of my less enlightened colleagues may offer “tacit resistance” to this initiative and reassure him that in such matters, as in so much of contemporary university management, all resistance will doubtless prove useless.

Their inspiring words did, however, raise one question in my mind. For neither made any mention of the forms of digital surveillance that will ensure that those conducting the surveillance to ensure that our work is “excellent” are themselves conducting such surveillance in a suitably “excellent” manner. In the absence of any such clarification, I can only conclude that our two admirable colleagues risk leaving the “excellence loop” dangerously open.

One of my older colleagues has just informed me of a well-known Latin phrase that apparently covers such cases. However, I cannot help but suspect that his age, combined with his recourse to Latin, marks this colleague out as a member of that class of academic who may foolishly “resist” these important initiatives. In such circumstances,
I feel it would be preferable if McLachlan and Richards could inform us of their own response to my concerns, a response doubtless free of that regrettable tendency to resist new initiatives that they have identified with such perspicacity.

Jeremy Lane
University of Nottingham

Send to

Letters should be sent to:

Letters for publication in Times Higher Education should arrive by 9am Monday. View terms and conditions.

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

PhD Scholar in Medicine

University Of Queensland

Manager, Research Systems and Performance

Auckland University Of Technology

Lecturer in Aboriginal Allied Health

University Of South Australia

Lecturer, School of Nursing & Midwifery

Western Sydney University

College General Manager, SHE

La Trobe University
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham