Israeli scholars asked to drop Ariel affiliation

Academics from controversial university were due to present papers at the European Association of Israel Studies’ annual conference

September 25, 2014

Researchers from a controversial Israeli university withdrew from an academic conference in London after being told that they could not mention their institutional affiliation.

Organisers of the European Association of Israel Studies’ annual conference, held last week at Soas, University of London, received proposals for papers from two scholars based at Ariel University.

Located on an Israeli settlement in the West Bank, Ariel was granted full university status in 2012 - to great controversy within Israel and widespread criticism outside.

EAIS chairman Clive Jones, professor of regional security at Durham University, said that because of this the organisation had taken the position that “until the status of the Occupied Territories has been decided between the two parties, we cannot recognise Ariel as a university which is part of the broader Israeli higher educational body”.

“When we had proposals submitted by people working at Ariel, we decided that they were welcome to come and present their papers but would have to give them as individual scholars rather than as academics representing Ariel University.”

He added: “The policy is driven by the fact that we don’t want to be politicised. We have to sit on a very thin fence and it’s often uncomfortable.”

The researchers based at Ariel decided not to participate on that basis. Yet the EAIS position was strongly challenged during the conference itself in a paper by Ruth Amossy, professor emeritus in French at Tel Aviv University, her PhD student Nadia Ellis and Denis Charbit of the Open University of Israel.

Since “a scholar is necessarily part of an institution that funds his research and allows him to build a position in the academic world”, they argued, “his participation in an academic event without the possibility to mention his professional affiliation goes against the very logic of the field…To boycott an institution but not its scholars is, somehow, to boycott a building but not those who work in it…excluding the academic affiliation to Ariel cannot butbe a political choice.”

Professor Jones, speaking generally about the EAIS, said that it was “an independent scholarly institution which embraces a diversity of opinion and views…there is a very febrile atmosphere at present [in discussions about the Middle East] and I want to make it very clear that we are a non-advocacy group”.

matthew.reisz@tesglobal.com

 

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Reader in Politics and Policy

St Marys University, Twickenham

Engineer

Cern

Professor of Anthropology

Maynooth University

Preceptor in Statistics

Harvard University

Postdoctoral Fellowship in Electrochemistry

Norwegian University Of Science & Technology -ntnu
See all jobs

Most Commented

Doctoral study can seem like a 24-7 endeavour, but don't ignore these other opportunities, advise Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O'Gorman

Matthew Brazier illustration (9 February 2017)

How do you defeat Nazis and liars? Focus on the people in earshot, says eminent Holocaust scholar Deborah Lipstadt

Laurel and Hardy sawing a plank of wood

Working with other academics can be tricky so follow some key rules, say Kevin O'Gorman and Robert MacIntosh

Improvement, performance, rankings, success

Phil Baty sets out why the World University Rankings are here to stay – and why that's a good thing

Warwick vice-chancellor Stuart Croft on why his university reluctantly joined the ‘flawed’ teaching excellence framework