End of flat fee raises fears

April 7, 1995

From the end of this month, the "backbone" of the United States Internet will be privatised. A year ago, the Usenet discussion groups carried on the Internet were alive with speculation on the dire effects of this. Now, most people are much calmer.

At present, US universities pay the National Science Foundation a flat annual fee for an Internet connection of a given capacity, and can run it flat out at no extra cost. In a few months, they will start getting bills from Sprint, Ameritech and Pacific Bell for the volume of information they send out.

As Lee McLoughlin, system administrator for London's Imperial College says, this "may change what information (US universities) are prepared to make publicly available and to whom they give access." That would affect United Kingdom access to major archive sites for information and tools.

But "sponsorship is the obvious way" to fund these, says McLoughlin. We could see the archive of Usenet discussions becoming "rtfm.mit.edu sponsored by Cisco".

Daniel Schneider, technical research assistant developing education materials at the University of Geneva's School of Psychology, is more concerned: "If the US network starts charging it will be catastrophic for us - though if things move slowly we'll be able to work something out. As a small unit, if our access to large organisations' sites were restricted we'd lose our level of competence."

UK government representatives will say only that "there are some interesting issues to probe". One of these, McLoughlin says, is whether JANET will also move to charge for volumes of data transmitted.

There has been concern that charging for volume will kill mailing lists. These may be the most primitive form of communication on the net, from a technical point of view; but in many ways they are intellectually the most evolved.

But Steve Wolff, director of the NSF division of networking and communications, predicted last year that the market would ensure flat-rate charging survived.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns