The Pick - Books & Babies

July 14, 2011

Books & Babies

Cambridge University Library

A scholar sits at a plush desk as a woman in a see-through wrap parades before him. This enticing image forms the frontispiece to a 19th-century edition of a strange compilation called Aristotle's Masterpiece, first published in 1684, which incorporates a manual on midwifery.

For generations, a wide variety of people - a group of boys in a mining community, a factory girl in 1920s Manchester, even Molly Bloom in James Joyce's Ulysses - turned to this improbable source for titillation and basic information about sex. It was still available in Soho in the 1930s.

Today, of course, it is impossible to avoid sex. The "facts of life" have featured on the school curriculum since the 1960s. Students are issued with contraceptive "survival kits". Feminists and "pro-lifers" openly promote their very different views on the same issues.

Yet for much of human history, those wanting to find out about "where babies come from" had limited options. Few had access to expensive volumes such as William Hunter's The Anatomy of the Human Gravid Uterus (1774), where the text was in Latin and the illustrations tainted with violent misogyny.

This remarkable exhibition, at the Cambridge University Library until 23 December, explores how reproduction has been communicated from the age of fertility figurines to the age of the internet. It was curated by the "Generation to Reproduction" group of Cambridge historians of science as part of a broader project, funded by the Wellcome Trust, to re-examine the history of reproduction.

On one level, it tracks a crucial shift from the notion of "generation" - the moment when a human being acquired a rational soul - to a scientific, sperm-meets-ovum understanding of reproduction. This may represent an advance in understanding, but it also paved the way for eugenics, racial science and the vast tracts of pseudo-erudition that underlay Nazi sterilisation policies.

Despite the changes in communications media and the ways we think about reproduction, Books & Babies suggests that some of our anxieties keep recurring. Nineteenth-century fears about evolution mutate into the imagery of Stanley Kubrick's science-fiction film 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968). Certaine Secrete Wonders of Nature, recorded by Pierre Boaistuau in 1569, included abnormal births alongside demons and sea monsters. Martin Luther created a "pope-ass" to satirise the corruption of the Catholic Church. Others have been fascinated by conjoined twins and the extraordinary Mary Toft, who was said to have produced a litter of rabbits in 1726. Even today, unusual births attract a good deal of lurid interest and often indignation, beautifully captured in a 2009 Daily Mail headline about "Octomom" Nadya Suleman: "How the heartwarming tale of the U.S. octuplets became a seedy story of self-indulgence".

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (29 June 2017)

Academics who think they can do the work of professional staff better than professional staff themselves are not showing the kind of respect they expect from others

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride

Senior academics at Teesside University put at risk of redundancy as summer break gets under way

Tef, results, gold, silver, bronze, teaching excellence framework

The results of the 2017 teaching excellence framework in full. Find out which universities were awarded gold, silver or bronze

Thorns and butterflies

Conditions that undermine the notion of scholarly vocation – relentless work, ubiquitous bureaucracy – can cause academics acute distress and spur them to quit, says Ruth Barcan