Sir Anthony Seldon: from Wellington to Buckingham

The headmaster of the independent college reflects on his move to the helm of a private university

June 4, 2015
Paul Bateman illustration (4 June 2015)
Source: Paul Bateman

Since my appointment as the new vice-chancellor of the University of Buckingham was announced, I have received some wonderfully supportive and encouraging messages from people in the university sector, including vice-chancellors. But I have also received some less pleasant responses, such as “It will be very different to running a school, you know”, and “The private sector has no place in British higher education. Get lost.”

It is perfectly fair to ask whether a school headmaster has the experience to run a university. I have much to learn about this new world – not least the acronyms – and it all seems quite daunting. But I am already visiting universities the length and breadth of the country and am trying to learn fast.

It is also true that much seems familiar. Wellington College is not so far removed from a university as all that. It is a large residential school that employs 500 staff, which also has campuses in China and two state-funded schools in the UK. Like a vice-chancellor, I galvanise the organisation, decide its goals with the support of my board and drive them through to realisation. Those goals include attracting and retaining the best academic staff and students, maximising the student learning experience, marketing the institution internationally and overseeing a substantial budget (of some £40 million, in Wellington’s case).

My primary task at Wellington is to maximise the academic performance of students and to ensure that we have sufficient finance to allow us to innovate. In the past 10 years, we have been the fastest improving independent school in the country at A level, and student numbers have almost doubled. We have also attracted outstanding staff, many with first-class degrees from top universities and some with research degrees on top.

The UK has a small but disproportionately powerful private school sector, accounting for only 7 per cent of school places but producing some 35 per cent of the students who go on to top universities. The private sector acts as a spur, as well as an irritant, to the state sector, which would be much more complacent and less successful without it.

The UK’s private higher education sector is considerably smaller and weaker. Buckingham was the UK’s first private university, starting life in 1976. The furore that greeted A. C. Grayling’s announcement in 2011 that he was creating the New College of the Humanities in London showed how raw feelings are, and how suspicious the higher education world is of private providers. The outcry was unpleasant and counterproductive. What exactly were the protesters so afraid of? Why is the very idea of private provision anathema to them?

But we must distinguish between two kinds of private higher education institutions: those that are not for profit, and those that are for profit. Buckingham is most definitely in the former camp. The importance of the distinction is best illustrated by looking at the US, where the private sector dominates both the top and the bottom of university rankings. But while the 24 private institutions packed into Forbes’ top 25 are non-profit, the bottom positions in the US rankings are held by for-profit wholesale providers, a number of which were investigated by a US Senate committee for poor standards.

Universities motivated primarily by profit find it very hard to resist maximising quantity over quality, and engaging in academic cost-cutting for the sake of quick returns. It is also much harder for them to justify resources going towards pure research, except where it is of direct interest and benefit to a funder. There may well be a place in the UK for for‑profit higher education institutions, but Buckingham under me will most certainly not be one of them.

The UK needs a virile private not-for-profit university sector that can use its freedom to challenge, innovate and indeed irritate the state-funded sector. The competition they provide is good for everyone, for students as well as for staff. Arthur Seldon, my father and one of the intellectual forces behind the creation of Buckingham, wrote about the “common fallacy” that only the state can run universities and that the public interest and national need will be served only if the state is the monopoly provider.

As a head for 25 years, and as a father of three children who have attended different UK universities, I can see why many find the experience of securely funded public universities disappointing. I hear regular complaints about lack of engagement from teaching staff, low interaction time with academics, poor feedback on written work, undemanding assignments, lack of intellectual stimulus and poor standards of pastoral oversight and care. So I can sympathise with increasingly large numbers who want to go off to the US to study.

At Buckingham, I will be building on 40 years of fine work, pioneered by its first principal, Max Beloff, and continued so capably by my predecessor, Terence Kealey. I want Buckingham to become a distinguished academic institution, providing high-quality degrees and conducting world-class research in a variety of fields. Because its funding does not come from the state, it should be free to devise innovative courses that appeal to the students and that truly educate them. Driving this forward is an opportunity I relish.

Sir Anthony Seldon is headmaster of Wellington College. He will take over as vice-chancellor of the University of Buckingham on 1 September 2015.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments


Article originally published as: Pastures new (4 June 2015)

Reader's comments (1)

Is it just me, or does this read like self-justification and somewhat smug? What on earth is the basis for the statement about private schools being a 'spur' against 'complacency' in the public sector? Don't you mean, existing, leech-like on questionable 'charitable' status and lax taxation regimes, fees and donations, to be spectacularly over-funded in comparison to the state sector which teaches the majority of the population, compensating for limited resources with dedicated, qualified teachers who, for the most part, give it their all? The English private school education system is the defining hallmark of an unequal, class-ridden society that preselects for universities, high status professions, politics and influence on the basis of wads of cash and connections. Or maybe I've just had a hard day at the chalkface of the public sector and I need to see the light of the New Labour-Old Tory hegemony.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (29 June 2017)

Academics who think they can do the work of professional staff better than professional staff themselves are not showing the kind of respect they expect from others

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride

Sir Christopher Snowden, former Universities UK president, attacks ratings in wake of Southampton’s bronze award

Senior academics at Teesside University put at risk of redundancy as summer break gets under way

Tef, results, gold, silver, bronze, teaching excellence framework

The results of the 2017 teaching excellence framework in full. Find out which universities were awarded gold, silver or bronze