Laurie Taylor Column

October 20, 2006

Some departments meet the QAA requirement to publish external examiners' reports online by providing their own summaries - The Times Higher, October 13 .

Right, Maureen. What's the first line of Tussock's report?

Our external starts by saying: "Although the overall standard of the finals papers was relatively satisfactory, students on the postmodernism and semiology courses failed to show any comprehensive grasp of the subject."

Far too verbose. How about: "The overall standard was very satisfactory." And forget the business about postmodernism and semiology. We don't want to get bogged down in detail.

But you've changed " relatively satisfactory " to " very satisfactory ".

Always go for the shorter word. "Very" saves six letters. Next.

"The project paper was disappointing. Students appeared to have received insufficient supervision and produced papers of extremely variable quality."

That can easily come down. How about: "There was a wide range of quality on display in the project papers." Next.

"Insufficient attention was paid by the internals to basic spelling and grammar."


But that's not a summary. That's an omission.

All summaries involve omissions or how else could they ever be summaries? Next.

"In summary, another year in which the expectations raised by the course outlines failed to be realised in practice."

That's got to go. We can hardly have a summary of a summary. I mean, who's doing this summary? Tussock or me? Next.

"In conclusion I must thank the department for their hospitality and, of course, for the absolutely excellent dinner."

Cut that a bit. What's left now?

"The overall standard was very satisfactory. There was a wide range of quality on display in the project papers. Absolutely excellent dinner."

A model of concision. Leave out "dinner" and Bob's your uncle.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns