Stasi 'evidence' 1

November 25, 2005

I am a former prisoner of the Stasi (the East German secret police) who was held in December 1983 in the infamous Hohenschonhausen Prison in Berlin on trumped-up charges of treason against an authoritarian regime in a state whose citizen I was not.

It is therefore supremely ironic - and from an academic point of view deeply disturbing - to find the same informers' accounts that led to my wrongful arrest and imprisonment being cited by Anthony Glees in his "Einhorn story" as respectable archival sources ("Scholar bites back at Stasi 'innuendo'", November 4).

Stasi files illuminate the workings of the Stasi: they cannot stand as historical evidence, especially where they are subject neither to critical evaluation nor to balancing by other data sources. Glees's book The Stasi Files cannot therefore be regarded as a serious piece of academic research.

In the context of Glees's book - and his accusations against John Sandford and others, including myself - it must be stated that dialogue with official government sources and with unofficial (dissident) peace and human rights groups in Eastern Europe was the openly declared policy of the Campaign for European Nuclear Disarmament just as it was the policy, for most of the years of the Cold War, of the British Government. To suggest retrospectively, as Glees does, that such dialogue showed naivety - or worse, constituted wilful ignorance of the nature of the dialogue partners - would be laughable, were it not dangerous and delusional.

Journalists should be wary of giving so much space - and credence - to this man.

Barbara Einhorn Sussex University

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns