Peerless ideas

January 10, 2008

Stevan Harnad compares peer review to the "ragtag" generic panel (Letters, 4 January).

Wikipedia is the most massively peer-reviewed publication in the history of publication, and every single article stands or falls on the basis that a majority have read, understood and these days checked the references.

Publishing has changed. "Open publishing" (like "open-source" software) allows review and revision by anybody who takes an interest. No longer is there a need for a central committee, just a large enough set of interested "eyeballs".

Gordon Joly,
London E14.

Please login or register to read this article

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments