Non-nonsense nature

January 3, 2003

I do not share Michael Rutter's confidence that the blank-slate view of human nature has been widely rejected (Books, THES , December 13) and think it is unfair to claim that Steven Pinker's The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature is based on a premise that is "simply nonsense".

Pinker's book is not addressed to those who realise that biology is important in understanding human behaviour but to the many who have inherited the blank-slate assumption in their disciplines. These include sociology, anthropology, cultural studies and much of psychology.

Academics in all disciplines should start to feel comfortable using the term human nature without enclosing it in embarrassed quotation marks. They should take our evolved nature seriously in guiding their research. To the extent that Pinker's book will encourage this acceptance of human nature, by showing how ridiculous its denial is, it is far from being "silly" as Rutter claims.

Daniel Jones
London, SE16

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments