Letter: Dearing, do... (2)

October 12, 2001

Peter Lampl contends that "rich students should pay the full cost of tuition fees to subsidise poor undergraduates" ("Lampl: fee system is rigged", THES , October 5), but there are few rich students, even if their parents are wealthy.

The error lies in the failure to accept that a student is an adult and, as such, must be treated on their own standing, not their parents'. No student would want to be patronised in the way Lampl proposes.

Eighteen-year-olds only become adults when the government wants them for cannon-fodder. Earlier governments recognised - or were properly informed by civil servants - that money paid out through grant and tuition fees was amply returned via general taxation, usually many times over. The loans plus up-front tuition fees model has worked perfectly to preserve higher education and the higher-paid professions for the well-off.

The government must grasp a simple truth - that higher education is no more a luxury than primary education. A society that does not ensure that anyone capable and willing should gain the opportunity of higher studies will face economic collapse.

Andrew Morgan

Please login or register to read this article

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments