Thought provoking and beyond metaphor

Mind As Motion
May 17, 1996

In recent years computational ideas have had a pervasive influence on cognitive psychology. Not only have many detailed computational models of cognitive processes emerged, but numerous computational metaphors and analogies have entered into the parlance and the thinking of those studying cognition. Notional processing resources, memory buffers, and subroutines are often invoked in an attempt to understand human perception, thought, and action. The computational approach to cognition has led to many significant insights. But the analogy fails to capture crucial aspects of mental processes, most notably the dynamic way that cognitive operations unfold. The contributors to Mind as Motion believe that there is a framework better suited to understanding and modelling the key features of human cognition, and this they term the dynamical approach.

The dynamical approach takes its name and inspiration from the study of dynamical systems in mathematics, systems whose behaviour is equated with the change of numerical states over time. Each chapter provides a sample of recent work using the dynamical approach, illustrating the application of dynamics to the study of cognition in accessible and often thought-provoking ways. We are given a lucid introduction to dynamics which assumes only a basic knowledge of calculus and matrix algebra, but instead relies on graphical and qualitative descriptions to provide the reader with a feel for the behaviour of a range of simple dynamical systems. Concepts such as attractor and bifurcation, stability and catastrophe, characterise the behaviour of dynamical systems and, it is argued, the dynamics of cognition.

The dynamical approach is a paradigm in the Kuhnian sense to compete with the established computational approach. While a dynamical approach to cognition was proposed by Ashby as long ago as 1952, it was the computational approach which dominated thinking in AI and cognitive science. Rather than the algorithmic manipulation of internal symbols, the dynamical approach views cognitive processes as the behaviour of nonlinear dynamical systems. The computational approach is criticised for its failure to capture the temporal aspects of cognitive operations; its serial transitions between discrete states being contrasted with the multiple simultaneous interactions displayed by dynamical systems.

Mind as Motion is aimed at a general audience of cognitive scientists. Contributions on topics ranging from visual perception and sensorimotor coordination to auditory perception, language production and event recognition catalogue the way in which the dynamical systems approach has contributed to progress in particular fields. The relationship of the dynamical approach to more established methods is covered in the introduction. For example, some of the chapters, such as Elman's paper on language processing, use neural network models which fall into both the "dynamical" and the "connectionist" camps. However, a single philosophy unites all the contributions - the belief that natural cognitive systems will be best understood by using dynamics.

Colin Clifford is a research student in psychology, University College London.

Mind As Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition

Editor - Robert F. Port and Timothy van Gelder
ISBN - 0 262 16150 8
Publisher - MIT Press
Price - £50.95
Pages - 590

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns