Social Anthropology and Human Origins

April 14, 2011

The study of human origins has, apparently, a big problem. A massive, unspoken problem, lurking like a veritable herd of elephants in the room. Or to use a metaphor more appropriate to this book, a social anthropologist cowering under the bed. Except, when the problem is analysed, the only issue with human origins is that a social anthropologist thinks that it should have more social anthropology in it (name a subject area to which that doesn't apply!).

Alan Barnard's aim is to start a discussion about the role that social anthropology should play in the study of human origins. He suggests that as the largest sub-group of the discipline, it should be a relatively simple task to shine the light of social anthropology on our evolution to correct the errors made by all those cold, clinical scientists. As a final coup de grâce, after a very selective review of some of the more recent human evolutionary literature, he concludes that we need to reclassify human origins as a sub-field of social anthropology. Please excuse me if I don't shout "hooray!" at this suggestion, but at the same time, don't assume I have an axe to grind with social anthropology: as part of a Royal Anthropological Institute team, I have designed an anthropology A level that combines both social and biological themes to celebrate what we share while enjoying different opinions and approaches.

Barnard argues that the traditional methods employed by biological anthropologists are not good enough to explain our evolution, as they do not take into account the social or cultural aspects of our evolutionary journey. I am at a loss to reconcile this statement and others like it with the subject I am part of. The study of human origins is no longer the preserve of "us" biological anthropologists: we collaborate with geneticists, climate scientists, primatologists, archaeologists and ecologists.

Barnard suggests that the application of lessons learned from social anthropology could improve the depth of human origins as a field. It is a laudable intention with a fatally limited scope, which he inadvertently points out at the end of chapter 3, stating that social anthropology cannot really offer anything for the study of species other than Homo sapiens - and of course we form only a small part of the evolutionary story of hominins.

This book's thesis unwittingly portrays social anthropology as a subject crying out in the wilderness in search of modern-day relevance: nothing could be further from the truth. It is a vibrant subject with multiple applications across a wide spectrum. The lack, or perceived lack, of social anthropological ideas in the study of human origins is the product of the nature of social anthropological study, based as it often is on the solo participant observation method of study.

While this is a point that Barnard concedes, it makes the conclusion of his book all the more galling for the huge range of scientists working in the field of human origins.

Social Anthropology and Human Origins

By Alan Barnard. Cambridge University Press. 196pp, £48.00 and £16.99. ISBN 9780521765312 and 9299. Published 17 March 2011

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Assistant Recruitment - Human Resources Office

University Of Nottingham Ningbo China

Outreach Officer

Gsm London

Professorship in Geomatics

Norwegian University Of Science & Technology -ntnu

Professor of European History

Newcastle University

Head of Department

University Of Chichester
See all jobs

Most Commented

men in office with feet on desk. Vintage

Three-quarters of respondents are dissatisfied with the people running their institutions

students use laptops

Researchers say students who use computers score half a grade lower than those who write notes

Canal houses, Amsterdam, Netherlands

All three of England’s for-profit universities owned in Netherlands

Humboldt University, Berlin

As the country succeeds in attracting even more students from overseas, a mixture of demographics, ‘soft power’ concerns and local politics help explain its policy

sitting by statue

Institutions told they have a ‘culture of excluding postgraduates’ in wake of damning study