Stand by Me: The Forgotten History of Gay Liberation, by Jim Downs

Angelia Wilson on a time in gay culture that no one forgot

May 19, 2016
Gathering of members of the Gay Liberation Movement
Source: Rex
Vibrant culture: but were white, middle-class gay men part of the problem?

This is, we are told, “the forgotten history of gay liberation”. But no one I know forgot. And I’m not that old.

With his newly minted history PhD, Jim Downs attended the 2005 Tribeca Film Festival premiere of the documentary Gay Sex in the 70s, whose director Joseph Lovett was disappointed that twentysomethings were unaware of the era’s unrestrained sex. Having watched it, Downs was similarly disappointed that Lovett’s post-HIV portrayal turned the 1970s into a “morality play”. Stand by Me, his corrective to Lovett’s thesis, presents an alternative picture of 1970s gay culture as “largely forgotten”.

The book opens with a graphic tale of the 1973 Upstairs Lounge fire in New Orleans that killed 32 attendees of the Metropolitan Community Church (MCC). This introduces further stories of the religious gay community in setting the early political agenda around same-sex marriage and ministering to incarcerated gay men. Other chapters recount the lives of Craig Rodwell, founder of the Oscar Wilde Memorial Bookshop in New York, and Jonathan Katz, author of the iconic study Gay American History: Lesbians and Gay Men in the U.S.A. Having established these religious and cultural aspects of the gay community, Downs describes the importance of, and controversial end to, the Canadian gay newspaper The Body Politic. This persuasive counterpoint to Lovett merits credit as polemic demonstrating a “good working knowledge” or “broad basic understanding”, but fails to provide new historical evidence or rigorous academic analysis of familiar events.

There is more detail on the Upstairs Lounge fire Wikipedia page, or in Downs’ own 2013 Time article, than in this book. The histories of Rodwell, Katz and Troy Perry, the MCC’s founder, are already well documented, and yet previous accounts go largely unacknowledged by Downs. Likewise, the plethora of underground newspapers in the 1970s have served as empirical data for countless stories of the radical Left, civil rights, feminist and LGBT movements – particularly The Body Politic and its controversial article on man/boy “love” that sparked outrage outside and inside the movement. But Downs claims that such elements of vibrant gay culture that “shaped the 1970s have been forgotten”. By whom?

Compounding Downs’ lack of originality is the fact that he is much less meticulously careful than most historians to avoid unfounded causal connections. Anita Bryant’s 1977 Save Our Children campaign, aimed at striking down Florida ordinances banning discrimination based on sexual orientation, was, Downs says, a reaction to the growth of gay religious groups. As an expert on the American Christian Right, I am unaware of a direct causal connection, and Stand by Me offers no evidence for this assertion.

Similarly, Downs argues that the fragmentation of the “gay movement” was caused by the centrality of the hyper-masculine “clone” image popularised by the Village People. “The macho clone diminished the presence of lesbians” and “drove many lesbians out of the gay liberation movement”. Really? Most gender studies graduate students would argue that the performativity of the clone offered an ironic commentary on hetero-normative masculinity and challenged its “natural” power. The clone image is certainly not cited by most lesbian feminists or African American LGBT activists as the problem with the 1970s gay movement.

In blaming fragmentation of the 1970s gay movement on the image of the clone, Downs avoids holding white, gay, middle-class men unwilling to share power responsible. Moreover, problematising the clone becomes his excuse not to integrate lesbian, African American or other voices into his “forgotten history”. Clones were not the problem. White, gay, masculine privilege that relied on entitlement and ignored other voices was the problem.

Angelia Wilson is professor of politics, University of Manchester.

Stand by Me: The Forgotten History of Gay Liberation
By Jim Downs
Basic Books, 272pp, £18.99
ISBN 9780465032709
Published 24 March 2016

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Reader's comments (2)

Thanks for reviewing my book. Could you please tell me where "the histories of Rodwell and Katz are already well documented. Can you also tell me what academic other trade books have discussed the entire gay religious movement not just single branches like the MCC? Also, when did Wikipedia become a source that academics or other readers can trust? The account in my book on the upstairs lounge fire is much more detailed than the article in Time magazine: in fact, I did more research in the police records after I published that article. Did you read the footnotes? You mention that I talked about other things that are well known. Where are the references to the upstairs lounge fire in major American history textbook as well as references to gay people fighting for gay prison rights in the historiography? Who else has talked about the ways in which gay people began a campaign for prisoners rights based on the black power movement? Additionally, the history of the newspaper "the body politic" has also not been told. My chapter on the clone is an interpretation like all history it's based on evidence and analysis. Since when are grad students alleged comments the proxy for archival research and analysis? My footnotes include original research. If you want to make claims that my book is unoriginal, then you need to say in the review what other historians or books have actually treated these topics. I don't mean to be defensive but I've worked on that book for 10 years and it seems that you were incredibly dismissive based purely on the subtitle. You could critique the subtitle without throwing my book, the 1970s, and the history of gay people under the bus. Jim Downs
The initial growth from the first night's riot and then subsequent protests into the formation of the Christopher Street Liberation Front were a much more diverse & inclusive population. Unfortunately, imho, that particular well of information has been "poisoned" by D. Carter's STONEWALL and now Emmerich 's movie. Also, the eventual growth of GAA & GLF greatly increased the exclusion of diversity as the image of gay white male gathered social traction. As a Stonewaller, it's difficult not to want a more complete history, but so many of us who were there are gone.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Organisation Design Specialist UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN (UCD)
Dean of Health and Social Care STAFFORDSHIRE UNIVERSITY
Dean of Engineering and Creative Arts STAFFORDSHIRE UNIVERSITY
Dean of Law, Policing and Forensics STAFFORDSHIRE UNIVERSITY
Lecturer in Composition DURHAM UNIVERSITY

Most Commented

University of Oxford students walking on campus

University of Oxford snatches top spot from Caltech in this year’s World University Rankings as Asia’s rise continues

Home secretary says government will support 'best' universities

Man handing microphone to audience member

Academic attainment of disadvantaged students can be improved if they can decide how they are assessed, study claims

Italy's gold medallist

New measures to ensure universities are ‘not penalised’ for taking poorer students also outlined for next stage of TEF

PhD lettered on book spine

Billy Bryan and Furaha Asani look at how to get the most out of your doctoral studies