Moral Crusades in an Age of Mistrust: The Jimmy Savile Scandal by Frank Furedi

May 23, 2013

Frank Furedi sets out to do two things in this book. First, he analyses the media circus that ensued after the 2012 airing of a BBC Newsnight report on allegations of sexual abuses committed by the entertainer Jimmy Savile; it presented, among other things, false allegations against Lord McAlpine, and in its wake came the resignation of BBC director-general George Entwistle and widespread journalistic licence that prompted Prime Minister David Cameron to warn against witch-hunts. Second, he examines how such scandals point to the desire for moral surety and moral crusade in a time of deep social disconnection.

On the first point, Furedi succeeds in showing how such scandals take on unruly lives of their own. He chronicles the increasingly hyperbolic nature of coverage of the Savile story, and raises important points about the “open secret” of Savile’s predilections and how criticism of the hedonism of the 1960s and 1970s displaced consideration of the tacit consent offered by those around Savile at the time.

But it is in Furedi’s second aim - explanation of the sociological mechanism of crusades - that his analysis ultimately falls short. He rightly asserts that the body of the child and its safety has become one of the last sacred spaces in a fragmented culture. Reports of its violation thus prompt a collective focus on moral boundary-setting that can have dangerous consequences. As he notes: “Savile’s abuse of children should be interpreted as the catalyst that unleashed the pre-existing mistrust and resentment of unsettled and uncertain moral communities.” For Furedi, shifts in the social construction of the child (as more sacred than utilitarian), anxious parenting, fears about “toxic childhoods”, the rise of victim culture and extension of the term “abuse” are all to blame.

What is lost is the way each of these points relates back to the Savile case and any sense of the sociological nuance surrounding what it means to live in a culture in which constructing singular monsters dilutes the complexity of the sexual exploitation of children and young people. Indeed, after the first three of eight very short chapters, Moral Crusades in an Age of Mistrust reads like an unfocused rant against a culture bent on hindering individual freedom, a culture where being a victim is apparently more desirable than individual achievement and where everything is seen as abuse.

What is most astonishing, however, is that any consideration of feminism, other than via a few derisive sentences, is completely absent from this text. For example, in his chapter on the social construction of abuse discourse, Furedi fails to mention that the concept of sexual abuse was a feminist response to actual violence against children.

Unlike authors such as James Kincaid, Steven Angelides, Dany Nobus, Karen Sternheimer and Philip Jenkins whose work carefully probes our culture’s narratives to render visible our paradoxical and vexed relationship to children, sexuality and sexual abuse, Furedi seems all too ready to settle into a reductionist argument about moral crusades. Because of this, what he cannot seem to hold in the balance is that the issue of child sexual abuse is deeply complex: that while children are sexually exploited more often than not in the home (or very close to it), our culture focuses on the threat of “stranger danger”; that there are systems of laws in place regarding paedophilia that are draconian at best and inhumane at worst, leaving little room for the harder work of restorative justice in families and communities (including the excellent work of the activist organisation Generation Five); that power difference and violence are not uncommon in molestation but that not all individuals who have experienced intergenerational sex view their relationships within this frame; and finally, as numerous studies have shown, that in addition to our penchant for innocence, our culture is also deeply suspicious of children and their sexuality.

Much like the recent Jerry Sandusky case in the US, what the Savile case illuminates is how stories of the past are often what psychoanalysts refer to as “screen memories”, and that reducing this case to the story of an evil individual serves to repress discussion of far more painful issues of violence in extended families, institutional neglect and our unresolved cultural ambivalence about children and sexuality.

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Professor in Music and Performance UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH WALES
Professor in Design UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH WALES
Professor of Storytelling UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH WALES
Professor of Creative Industries UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH WALES
Postdoctoral Position in Modelling of Farming Systems SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES SLU

Most Commented

question marks PhD study

Selecting the right doctorate is crucial for success. Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O'Gorman share top 10 tips on how to pick a PhD

Pencil lying on open diary

Requesting a log of daily activity means that trust between the institution and the scholar has broken down, says Toby Miller

India, UK, flag

Sir Keith Burnett reflects on what he learned about international students while in India with the UK prime minister

Application for graduate job
Universities producing the most employable graduates have been ranked by companies around the world in the Global University Employability Ranking 2016
Construction workers erecting barriers

Directly linking non-EU recruitment to award levels in teaching assessment has also been under consideration, sources suggest