Farnsworth's Classical English Rhetoric

Geoffrey K. Pullum savours a guide to the potential of language but feels more modesty is required

August 11, 2011

In classical times, all advanced learning was founded on the linguistic topics of the trivium: grammar, rhetoric and logic. Only when those had been mastered could the student proceed to arithmetic, astronomy, music and geometry (the quadrivium). Rhetoric is distinct from both grammar (the syntactic form of sentences) and logic (the drawing of inferences from sentence meanings). It deals neither with structure nor meaning but with effect: the persuasive deployment of sentences.

The ancient Greeks and Romans developed elaborate arrays of technical terminology for talking about all three parts of the trivium. Ward Farnsworth's book undertakes a systematic survey of classical rhetorical terminology, liberally illustrated with quotations.

The 22 figures of speech covered are: epizeuxis (consecutive word repetition); conduplicatio (non-consecutive word repetition); epimone (consecutive phrase repetition); epanalepsis (repetition at both the beginning and the end of a sentence); anaphora (repetition at the beginning of a sentence - modern linguists use this term in a completely different sense); epistrophe (repetition at the end of a sentence or sentence-sequence); symploce (repetition at both the beginning and the end of successive sentences); anadiplosis (repeating the end of one sentence at the start of the next); polyptoton (repeating a root with a different inflectional ending); isocolon (repetition of similar structure); chiasmus (reversal of structure); anastrophe (inversion of conventional order); polysyndeton (use of additional coordinators); asyndeton (omitting coordinators); ellipsis (omitting words more generally); praeteritio (saying something by saying that you will not say it); aposiopesis (breaking off); metanoia (self-correction); litotes (saying something by denying its opposite); erotema (rhetorical questioning); hypophora (asking a question and answering it); and prolepsis (anticipating an objection and answering it).

If you knew every single one of those terms, then my compliments to you, and to your Classics teacher. But it won't mean you have no use for this book, for its glory lies not just in the clear expositions of the meanings of the terms, but in the copious illustrations provided. Farnsworth has selected passages of choice, juicy rhetorical prose (and occasionally poetry) by a selection of politicians, novelists and essayists. (I should note that they are pretty much all dead guys: page 8 has one sentence from Mary Shelley, bless her, but save that one example from Frankenstein I don't think I found any quotes from women at all.)

The examples are rich and chocolatey, making the book not just educative but fun - a browsable book for the shelves in the guest bedroom rather than a desk reference for the study.

One rhetorical device not mentioned in the book is exemplified in its title (I believe the Yiddish technical term for it is chutzpah): the epithet "Farnsworth's" of the title subliminally suggests that this is a major reference work from long ago by a famous senior scholar from the 18th or 19th centuries (and the 1765 cover painting of debaters in wigs reinforces this impression). But in fact Farnsworth is a young professor of law at Boston University, and the book is brand new.

Now, I am no advocate of false modesty - I say let your light shine forth rather than hide it. But prefixing the genitive form of your surname to the title of your own book to lend it more gravitas?

Perhaps Farnsworth or his publisher had seen this sort of thing on the spines of books of a certain vintage edited by modern scholars (the obvious example is Fowler's Modern English Usage) and imitated the device quite innocently. But it shocked me. The literary public may perhaps prefix your surname to the title of your magnum opus when you're long dead and much admired, but doing it yourself here and now looks pushy.

Farnsworth's Classical English Rhetoric

By Ward Farnsworth

David R. Godine

254pp, £24.95

ISBN 9781567923858

Published 4 July 2011

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (29 June 2017)

Academics who think they can do the work of professional staff better than professional staff themselves are not showing the kind of respect they expect from others

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride

Sir Christopher Snowden, former Universities UK president, attacks ratings in wake of Southampton’s bronze award

Senior academics at Teesside University put at risk of redundancy as summer break gets under way

Tef, results, gold, silver, bronze, teaching excellence framework

The results of the 2017 teaching excellence framework in full. Find out which universities were awarded gold, silver or bronze