Pogrom: Kishinev and the Tilt of History, by Steven J. Zipperstein

This analysis of an attack on Russian Jews paints a grim, important picture, writes Geoffrey Alderman

May 10, 2018
kishinev pogrom

In 1904, my Jewish paternal grandfather deserted from the army of Tsar Nicholas II and fled to England. I once asked him why. He replied: “Kishinev”.

Kishinev is now the capital of the Moldovan Republic. At the beginning of the 20th century it lay within the Bessarabia governance of the Russian Empire. On 19 and 20 April 1903, its Jewish population was subject to a series of brutal, sustained and – as it turned out – organised attacks. Forty-five Jews were killed. Hundreds were injured. There was widespread raping of Jewish women and girls. There was wholesale destruction of Jewish property and systematic looting of Jewish-owned shops.

Thanks to the efforts of the American newspaper tycoon William Randolph Hearst – and of the special correspondent whom Hearst had dispatched to the town (the Irish nationalist Michael Davitt) – authoritative eyewitness accounts of the pogrom were soon read worldwide. The accounts caused outrage in the West. Some months later, a young Russian-Jewish scholar, H. N. Bialik, wrote in Hebrew a poem that reflected on the pogrom. Like Davitt, Bialik travelled to Kishinev and interviewed many eyewitnesses. Yet the poem – In the City of Slaughter – amounted to an angry denunciation of the Jews of Kishinev, whom he accused of cowardice. To the young Zionist movement, then struggling to legitimate itself in the Jewish world, the popularity of Bialik’s poem proved a turning point.

These are two of the stories Steven Zipperstein has set out to tell. There are others. Mining an awe-inspiring array of sources, his book offers an hour-by-hour account of two days in the life of a city in which it had been said that Jew and non-Jew had been living contentedly side by side. This turned out to have been a myth. Beneath the surface there was a raw hostility – part religious, part economic – towards everything Jewish in the city.

Jewish households were ransacked by non-Jewish neighbours living in the same street. A Jewish woman was raped by a man she had known since his childhood. Jewish residents did try to defend themselves, but they were overwhelmed. It is equally untrue that the Tsarist authorities stood idly by. Law and order was, however, improperly deployed and of insufficient strength.

The evil genius behind the pogrom was Pavel Krushevan. A native Moldovan, he craved recognition and had used his news-sheet (Bessarabets) to launch weekly tirades against the Jews.

Zipperstein paints a grim picture of Krushevan as a psychopathic ultra-nationalist who was also the author of the first edition of the notorious The Protocols of Elders of Zion.

Zipperstein’s analysis of Kishinev – and of its impact on the Jewish condition worldwide – is probably not the last word on the subject. But for the present it must remain the most authoritative account we have.

Geoffrey Alderman is Michael Gross professor of politics and contemporary history at the University of Buckingham.

Pogrom: Kishinev and the Tilt of History
By Steven J. Zipperstein
Liveright, 288pp, £22.00
ISBN 9781631492693
Published 27 April 2018


Print headline: An account of raw hostility

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Related articles

Related universities

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Viewed

The University of Oxford is top in a list of the best universities in the UK, which includes institutions in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland

26 September

Most Commented

Universities in most nations are now obliged to prioritise graduate career prospects, but how it should be approached depends on your view of the meaning of education. Academics need to think that through much more clearly, says Tom Cutterham


Featured jobs

Teaching Fellow, School of Business and Management

Queen Mary University Of London

Lecturer in Health Visiting 

University Of The West Of Scotland

Lecturer in Accounting and Finance

University College Birmingham