Women demand seat at the tables

Manifesto calls for university rankings to take gender gap into account. David Matthews writes

December 6, 2012

Source: Getty

Dual labours: careers should not founder on family commitments

A university’s ranking in global league tables should be based in part on measures of gender equality, according to a manifesto demanding equality of opportunity and pay for female academics.

The manifesto, agreed by 50 academics from the UK, Australia and Asian countries following a British Council workshop on the subject, also calls for institutions to declare how many of their professors, top researchers and students are female. In 2010, just 29 per cent of researchers worldwide were female, according to the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation.

Katherine Forestier, a senior education consultant at the British Council in Hong Kong, said that this was down to discrimination and to family commitments thwarting women’s career ambitions. “Within their careers they have got to juggle teaching, research, administration and be productive at a time when they have family roles as well. [Juggling these roles] seems to be tougher in academia [than in other professions].”

When deciding on promotions, universities looked at the “quantity…rather than quality” of academic research, which made it difficult for female scholars who took time off to start families, Ms Forestier said.

The issue was something the UK research excellence framework has tried to address by allowing women who have been on maternity leave to submit less research.

Ms Forestier said the next step would be to speak to ranking organisations and to present the proposals at upcoming events. It was a “very realistic” aim to get global league tables to incorporate measures such as the pay gap between men and women and the gender make-up of senior management, she added.

A big problem was the lack of information on female representation and pay, and ranking organisations were in an ideal position to collect these data, she said.

Phil Baty, editor of Times Higher Education’s World University Rankings, said that its data partner Thomson Reuters was already collecting some basic gender data and that he would welcome discussions on how this might be used.

Gender inequality is not uniform across countries, Ms Forestier said, noting that at least half the researchers and university leaders in the Philippines - where 5 per cent of the higher education budget goes to support gender issues - are female.

The workshop, Absent Talent: Women in Research and Academic Leadership in East Asia, held in Hong Kong in September, heard that errors in assessing leadership potential and a gender bias in peer review exercises kept women from top positions in journals and institutions.

david.matthews@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 10 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Brexit, EU referendum

Joanna Williams voted Leave, and has been left disappointed by the academy’s reaction to the EU referendum result

Elly Walton illustration (7 July 2016)

Researchers in the liberal arts seem to have made it their mission to communicate in the most obscure fashion, says Zachary Foster

Daniel Mitchell illustration (14 July 2016)

Frank Furedi says the mournful mood on campus and the disparagement and silencing of Leave supporters betray an isolated scholarly class

Michael Parkin illustration (7 July 2016)

Rising immigration-related costs and lack of employer support send an unwelcoming message to international staff, says Jason Danely

People walk past second hand books for sale

Shift may be evidence that researchers feel they are increasingly judged on citations and journal impact factors