Tax business to abolish fees, union proposes

UCU cites Crossrail arrangement as evidence that plan could work. Hannah Fearn reports

March 3, 2010

Businesses should face a hefty tax hike to cover the cost of abolishing university tuition fees, the University and College Union says.

In a report published today, the UCU argues that raising the level of Corporation Tax to the average among the rich industrialised G7 nations would bring in enough money to make up the deficit.

At present, the UK tax stands at 28 per cent on profits above £1.5 million. The G7 average is 32.8 per cent.

The union claims its plans for a business education tax would still leave major UK firms better off than their G7 counterparts.

It added that the contribution of business to higher education is “negligible” at present.

The UCU cited the success of the 2p in the pound tax on London businesses introduced by Boris Johnson, Mayor of London, to pay for the Crossrail project as evidence that such a scheme could work.

Under the union’s proposals, companies that invested in continuing education would be rewarded with tax breaks.

Sally Hunt, general secretary of the UCU, said the proposals were “based on fairness”.

“We believe our proposals will be welcomed by hard-working families who want their children to benefit from education, but are put off by the potential debts created by university fees,” she said.

But Susan Anderson, director of education and skills at the CBI, said the UCU had “missed the point”.

“Damaging the economy by increasing tax on business won’t help young people go to university or boost their prospects when they graduate,” she said.

Keith Herrmann, deputy chief executive of the Council for Industry and Higher Education, added that the proposed funding arrangements could lead businesses to expect more control over universities – a situation the UCU would no doubt oppose.

Oisin McNamara, director of research, business and innovation at Northumbria University, agreed that compulsory levies may not be the best approach.

“A more positive way forward is developing long-term partnerships between higher education and business, whereby the latter pays the full economic costs of the services they receive, or shares the investment with the government if there are wider benefits.

“Universities need to work with the grain to help improve the competitiveness of business, as the future health of the public services depends on it.”

hannah.fearn@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Worried man wiping forehead
Two academics explain how to beat some of the typical anxieties associated with a doctoral degree
A group of flamingos and a Marabou stork

A right-wing philosopher in Texas tells John Gill how a minority of students can shut down debates and intimidate lecturers – and why he backs Trump

A face made of numbers looks over a university campus

From personalising tuition to performance management, the use of data is increasingly driving how institutions operate

students use laptops

Researchers say students who use computers score half a grade lower than those who write notes

As the country succeeds in attracting even more students from overseas, a mixture of demographics, ‘soft power’ concerns and local politics help explain its policy