Public health 'ignored'

April 2, 2004

Research into how to deal with public health threats such as severe acute respiratory syndrome, terrorism and obesity is being dangerously neglected, some of the country's leading health experts warned this week.

A working group of public health specialists, convened by the Wellcome Trust, published a damning report about the state of science in the field.

It concludes that public health research is seriously under-resourced and largely ignored until times of national crisis.

Stephen Frankel, professor of epidemiology and public health at Bristol University and chair of the working party, told The Times Higher: "Public health science is always very important. But the difficulty is maintaining the level of funding required in a competitive environment. It can get pushed aside by new developments in genetics and so on."

Although public health issues such as the possibility of chemical and biological terrorist attacks dominate the media, the report says that in 2003 just 0.4 per cent of biomedical research publications were relevant to public health.

It warns that young scientists are being put off entering the field by a lack of infrastructure and "ever-growing" levels of bureaucracy. It points out that researchers are struggling with a stream of new regulations controlling consent and data protection, including the Clinical Trials Regulations, the Data Protection Act, the Human Rights Act and the human tissues bill, which is under discussion in Parliament.

The group says a national strategy is needed to rescue research in this area. A white paper on public health is due this summer.

The report calls for a top-level funders group to focus on public health science and long-term investment in the academic infrastructure. It also calls for the establishment of public health centres to bring together scientists from different disciplines.

"We need to invest now in the next generation of specialist public health scientists to prepare for the increasingly important role they will need to play, given the high prominence public health is receiving from government," the working group concludes.

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns