Polish MEP and inventor Adam Gierek asks Commission about EPO case law

April 14, 2006

Brussels, 13 Apr 2006

Professor Adam Gierek MEP has asked the Commission whether it still thinks that the case law of the European Patent Office (EPO) should be apply to the Community Patent. He refers to the fact that the European Parliament rejected the EPO's case law regarding software patents, a discrepancy between EPO and national patent office practice, and also to several recent court decisions in the UK.

He is worried that the EPO's practice is discrediting the patent system as a whole. Professor Gierek is an inventor himself, with many patents on his name.

The Question

  • A patent system can play a fundamental role in establishing an appropriate legal status for innovations and ensuring that their originators are properly rewarded. I am concerned about European Patent Office (EPO) practices which are undermining the social acceptability of the patent system, with patents being granted for solutions that are not patentable under the current law.

Fortunately, the courts in the Member States are making use of their right to rescind patents granted by the EPO for software and business methods. The difference in approach between the EPO and, for example, the Polish patent office is illustrated by the fact that the latter has for months been refusing to grant two patents to applicants granted patents by the EPO. To date, the Polish courts have upheld these decisions.

Recently, the High Court of England and Wales ruled that two patents granted by the EPO were invalid on UK territory and emphasised the need for computer programs to be excluded from the scope of patent law even in cases where the use of a program produces a physical effect.

Before the vote held in the European Parliament on 6 July 2005, the rapporteur, Michel Rocard, said that 'rejection [of the directive] is a message directed at the European Patent Office. The European Parliament has refused to ratify the recent judicial errors by extending the scope of patentability to certain software programs'. However, the EPO has not heeded that message and has not changed its practices.

Given the above, does the Commission still stand by the position set out in point 2.3.2 of the proposal for a Council Regulation on the Community patent ( COM(2000) 412 final - 2000/0177(CNS) ), namely that the case law which the EPO developed for the European patent will apply to the Community patent?

Background information

Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure -- FFII
Item source

Already registered?

Sign in now if you are already registered or a current subscriber. Or subscribe for unrestricted access to our digital editions and iPad and iPhone app.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Elderly woman looking up at sky

A recent paper claims that the quality of researchers declines with age. Five senior scientists consider the data and how they’ve contributed through the years

Otto illustration (5 May 2016)

Craig Brandist on the proletarianisation of a profession and how it leads to behaviours that could hobble higher education

Woman tearing up I can't sign

Schools and universities are increasingly looking at how improving personalities can boost social mobility. But in doing so, they may be forced to choose between teaching what is helpful, and what is true, says David Matthews

Eleanor Shakespeare illustration 19 May 2016

Tim Blackman’s vision of higher education for the 21st century is one in which students of varying abilities learn successfully together

Door peephole painted as bomb ready to explode

It’s time to use technology to detect potential threats and worry less about outdated ideas of privacy, says Ron Iphofen