Labour losses may see fees scrapped

March 25, 2005

Top-up fees in England may be axed if Labour's majority is slashed in the forthcoming general election, according to the Universities Scotland organisation.

The umbrella body for Scottish principals believes that the pressure to scrap top-up fees could grow if the party's majority is cut significantly.

Scotland abolished upfront tuition fees at the insistence of the Liberal Democrats, who extracted the compromise as part of the power-sharing deal struck with the Scottish Labour Party.

A spokesman for Universities Scotland said: "Small majority politics could be back in England in the near future, and it is entirely possible that the outcome would be the end of top-up fees."

Peter Lynch, senior lecturer in politics at Stirling University, said Scotland would see "a strange kind of campaign" in the wake of devolution.

Parties should be dealing only with matters relating to Westminster, but he predicted that they would conflate devolved issues. Dr Lynch said that tensions were likely to emerge because Labour and the Lib Dems fight one another in Westminster on issues such as top-up fees but work in coalition in Scotland.

The Association of University Teachers Scotland is stressing common issues across the UK, from investment in teaching and research to an extension of academic freedom.

Tony Axon, research officer for the AUTS, said: "More public funding in England for higher education and the research councils will have a direct impact on funding for Scottish higher education."

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most commented

Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports

3 October


Featured jobs

SETsquared Centre Director

University Of Bristol

Lecturer in Maritime Law, Teaching only

Liverpool John Moores University

AcoRD Officer

University Of Leeds

Marketing and Communication Manager

Heriot-watt University