Irish dump fees plan to avert split

May 30, 2003

The Irish government has been forced to ditch plans to bring back tuition fees. Instead, it will invest more in schemes to help students from lower socioeconomic groups get into higher education.

The climbdown came at the weekend when it became clear the issue could cause the coalition government to collapse. The minority Progressive Democrats party strongly opposed the return of fees, abolished in 1996.

Education minister Noel Dempsey of the larger Fianna Fail party initially held his ground, insisting that he wanted the rich to pay fees to create funds for schemes for the disadvantaged.

After a week of political tension and student protest, a compromise was cobbled together that gets the government off the hook. Mr Dempsey will get extra funding this year from "savings" in a department run, ironically, by the Progressive Democrats.

The minister said he still believed the rich should pay but was satisfied he now had money from elsewhere to further his agenda.

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

Home secretary says government will support 'best' universities

Man handing microphone to audience member

Academic attainment of disadvantaged students can be improved if they can decide how they are assessed, study claims

Woman drinking tea from saucer

Plugging a multibillion-pound deficit exacerbated by June’s poll result may require ‘drastic measures’, analysts have warned

Italy's gold medallist

New measures to ensure universities are ‘not penalised’ for taking poorer students also outlined for next stage of TEF

Classroom, school

Higher education institutions can and should do more to influence education at a secondary school level, says Edward Peck