Integrity is not safe in hands of 'crass' government

Phil Baty reports on fierce debate at Natfhe's annual conference

The government will destroy the integrity of higher education if its white paper becomes law, Natfhe claimed at its annual conference.

Inflamed by education secretary Charles Clarke's recent remarks that "the unfettered pursuit of truth and excellence" did not in itself justify state funding for universities, Natfhe promised unceasing opposition to the "utilitarian" white paper. Seven motions attacking it were passed.

Mary Davis of Natfhe's inner-London region said: "Clarke and (higher education minister) Margaret Hodge want to create narrowly functional and utilitarian training-only institutions for the poor while sending the rich students to a British Ivy League. We must never, ever let the government get away with this."

A motion from Natfhe's southern region said: "This conference notes... the threat to the Socratic ideal of education presented in the white paper.

Conference declares its opposition to its alternative model of knowledge transfer, with its inference of mechanical teaching and passive learning".

A motion put by the southwest region said the union was "dismayed" by plans to concentrate research funding on an elite.

Mick Jardine of southern said: "The crassness of Clarke and Hodge is a disgrace."

Already registered?

Sign in now if you are already registered or a current subscriber. Or subscribe for unrestricted access to our digital editions and iPad and iPhone app.

Featured Jobs

Learning Enhancement Manager UNIVERSITY OF DERBY
Associate Dean (Education), Quality and Innovation AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY (ANU)

Register to continue  

You've enjoyed reading five THE articles this month. Register now to get five more, or subscribe for unrestricted access.

Most Commented

Universities to scale back liberal arts and social science courses

  • David Humphries illustration (24 September 2015)

A Russell Group tagline rap is further proof that we need to reform the academy’s approach, argues Philip Moriarty

  • World University Rankings 2015-2016 methodology

Change for the better: fuelled by more comprehensive data, the 2015-2016 rankings probe deeper than ever

  • World University Rankings

US continues to lose its grip as institutions in Europe up their game

Inspired by previous movement in 1960s, PhD students say that ‘science is not neutral’ and urge scientists to confront their assumptions