Holistic appeal

November 14, 1997

MARY WARNOCK (THES, October 31) describes the principle of double effect as "notoriously shifty".

I agree it can be shifty, but only when it is abused, which happens when the four criteria, which are very demanding, are not all fulfilled. The criteria are:

* the aim must be good

* the evil effect may be permitted but not desired

* the good effect must be better than the evil effect

* the action in itself must be morally licit.

So, for example, if a doctor gives a higher dose of pain-killer than is necessary to ease pain, knowing that that dose will shorten the patient's life, and knowing that a smaller dose would relieve the pain, then the principle of double effect is not fulfilled.

This principle, based on natural law - and therefore valid for all times and places - provides a clear guideline for judging the morality of an action.

It is disappointing that someone who is an ethics adviser does not stress the importance of the holistic approach so much sought after by the healthcare professionals looking after the dying.

Anne Dickinson

London, N1

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments


Featured jobs

Cloud Applications Manager

University Of Greenwich

Lecturer: Adult Nursing

University Of The West Of Scotland

Assistant Principal

Durham University

Content Manager

Cranfield University

Coaching Professional

Bpp University