GMOs and conventional crops: the battle over "coexistence"

December 19, 2003

Strasbourg, 18 Dec 2003

Friedrich- Wilhelm GRAEFE zu BARINGDORF (Greens/EFA, D)

Report on coexistence between genetically modified crops and conventional and organic crops


Doc.: A5-0465/2003 [may not be available yet]

Procedure: Own-initiative

Vote: 18.12.2003 (Rule 110a)


MEPs focussed on the difficulties of separating genetically modified organisms (GMOs) from conventional organisms in food and animal feed, when they adopted a highly contested own-initiative report by Friedrich-Wilhelm GRAEFE zu BARINGDORF (Greens/EFA, D). In general terms, MEPs are demanding stricter and more effective protection for organic and conventional farmers against accidental contamination of their crops and seeds. They highlight the need for EU common regulations on coexistence (instead of leaving the issue under subsidiarity rules, as the Commission suggested recently) and argue that GMO producers should have some kind of civil liability for any contamination of organic and conventional products.

The House calls "for rules to be established without delay at Community level on the coexistence of genetically modified crops and non-genetically modified crops". MEPs also ask for the European Parliament to be included in this process under the codecision procedure. The resolution adds that Member States should have the free choice to restrict GMO cultivation in certain geographical areas if they wish.

GMOs in seed production A new EU directive of June 2003 introduced a tolerance level of 0.9% of accidental GMOs in conventional crops. Should this threshold be exceeded, the producer will have to indicate it on the product label. MEPs support this measure but also share one of the main concerns among farmers: the potential presence of minute traces of GMOs in conventional seeds, which makes it practically impossible today to achieve 100% non-genetically modified crops. The European Commission has recently drafted guidelines suggesting a tolerance level for the adventitious presence of GMOs in seeds (between 0.3% and 0.7%, depending on the type of seed). In the text adopted, MEPs say that a limit value for the labelling of GMO impurities in seed should be set and they "call on the Commission to stipulate the labelling of GMOs in seed at the technically reliable detection threshold".

Civil liabilityMEPs also urge the Commission to bring forward "a proposal on Community-wide civil liability and insurance in respect of possible financial damage in connection with coexistence". Another recommendation adopted by the House "calls on the Commission and the Member States to include workable and legally enforceable civil liability provisions for sufficient insurance cover on the part of the applicant as a component of the authorisation procedure for placing GMOs on the market, so that claims by persons affected can be dealt with adequately and quickly in the event of damage".

Press enquiries: Maria Andrés Marìn (Strasbourg) tel.(33-3) 881 73603 (Brussels)  tel.(32-2) 28 44299 e-mail :

European Parliament Daily Notebook 2003-12-18

Please login or register to read this article.

Register to continue

Get a month's unlimited access to THE content online. Just register and complete your career summary.

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments


Featured jobs