Commission re-submits proposals on GMOs to Council

October 10, 2006

Brussels, 09 Oct 2006

The European Commission decided today to re-submit to the EU Council of Ministers proposals to lift the ban imposed by Austria on the marketing of two authorised genetically modified maize varieties, MON810 and T25. Austria introduced these bans under Directive 90/220/EEC in 1999 and 2000 respectively. The Council can either adopt or reject the proposals with a qualified majority. If no decision is taken after three months, the files return to the Commission which can then adopt them. If adopted Austria would have to repeal its national ban at the latest 20 days after it is formally notified of this decision. A further six bans were invoked by other Member States around the same time to ban the marketing of another GM maize variety (Bt176) and two oilseed rape varieties (Ms1Rf1 and Topas). The Scientific Committees reviewed all information submitted by these Member States as justification for their bans. In all cases, their scientific assessment was that this information provided no new elements of risk. This is why the Commission took the view that these safeguard clauses were not justified under EU law and submitted proposals to the Council of Ministers, in June 2005, to withdraw these bans. The Council disagreed with the Commission and voted against these proposals. In view of the Council position, the Commission decided to re-consult the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), a body composed of independent scientists, for a further opinion on the information provided by Austria to justify the bans. EFSA again concluded that this information did not constitute new elements of risk. The Commission is also considering the other six bans in light of the fact that the GMO products in question are no longer to be marketed and cultivated in the EU. This has effectively rendered the corresponding safeguard clauses for these products obsolete.

Midday Express 06/1009

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns