Antinuclear campaigners question the safety of Europe's ITER candidate site

December 9, 2003

Brussels, 08 Dec 2003

An organisation opposed to nuclear energy in France has voiced concerns over the safety of Europe's proposed site for the international thermonuclear experimental reactor (ITER) in Cadarache, in the south of the country.

The 'network for the abolition of nuclear energy' says plans to locate ITER in Cadarache should be cancelled, as there is an active geological fault seven kilometres from the proposed site.

The organisation claims that while the average annual force of tremors is very small, historical records show that the Durance fault can produce destructive earthquakes.

The network also points to a 2001 report by the French nuclear safety authority, which concluded that the area presents a 'significant seismic risk' and recommended the closure of six nuclear facilities on the basis that they were insufficiently resistant to earthquakes.

Supporters of the Cadarache site, however, will point to the existence of safety standards that will ensure that the ITER facility can withstand an earthquake more powerful than any other the area has witnessed for 500 years.

A final decision on where ITER will be built is expected to be made in Washington on 19 or 20 December. The proposed site at Cadarache faces competition from the other favourite in the race, Rokkasho in Japan.

For further information on ITER, please consult the following web address:
http://www.iter.org

CORDIS RTD-NEWS / © European Communities

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns