Animal testing agreement aims at more transparency

But animal rights group criticises move for not going far enough

May 14, 2014

Animal testing mice

A new agreement to improve transparency about the use of animals in research has been launched.

The Concordat on Openness, launched today by the charity Understanding Animal Research, has been signed by 72 scientific organisations, including universities, charities, research councils and learned societies.

Signatories must be clear on how, why and when animals are used in research. They will also pledge to be open with the media and the public about the benefits, harms and limitations of animal research, and about its impact on animal welfare. They should also offer realistic information on the potential outcomes of the research, it says.

But the British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection said that the agreement did not go far enough to disclose the details of experiments.

Michelle Thew, chief executive of the BUAV, said that “effective scrutiny” of the way animal experiments are carried out and regulated is “impossible” under the current system.

Wendy Jarrett, chief executive of Understanding Animal Research, said that for many years the only information available to the public about animal research came from “organisations opposed to the use of animals in scientific progress”.

“This is why many people still think that animal research means testing cosmetics and tobacco, despite the fact that these have been banned in the UK for more than 15 years.” 

She added: “The concordat is an excellent opportunity to dispel these myths and give the public a chance to see the ground-breaking research that is being done on its behalf.” 

But Ms Thew said that if animal researchers were “serious about favouring greater openness” they should lobby to get rid of section 24 of the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986.

This currently “prevents” the government from disclosing “most information” about animal research, she said.

Earlier this month, the government launched a consultation on changing section 24 to allow the Home Office to release more information on the animal experiments it has licensed. Ms Thew said this showed that the government was “one step ahead” of those involved in the concordat.

“Only with information can there be informed debate… If genuine openness is what the concordat wants, then we call on the signatories to back the removal of section 24,” she added.

holly.else@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

PhD Position in Archaeology and Cultural History

Norwegian University Of Science & Technology -ntnu

PhD position in Energy and Process Engineering

Norwegian University Of Science & Technology -ntnu

PhD position in Energy and Process Engineering

Norwegian University Of Science & Technology -ntnu

PhD position in Industrial Energy Efficiency

Norwegian University Of Science & Technology -ntnu

Postdoc in Traffic Engineering

Norwegian University Of Science & Technology -ntnu
See all jobs

Most Commented

Doctoral study can seem like a 24-7 endeavour, but don't ignore these other opportunities, advise Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O'Gorman

Matthew Brazier illustration (9 February 2017)

How do you defeat Nazis and liars? Focus on the people in earshot, says eminent Holocaust scholar Deborah Lipstadt

Improvement, performance, rankings, success

Phil Baty sets out why the World University Rankings are here to stay – and why that's a good thing

Warwick vice-chancellor Stuart Croft on why his university reluctantly joined the ‘flawed’ teaching excellence framework

people dressed in game of thrones costume

Old Germanic languages are back in vogue, but what value are they to a modern-day graduate? Alice Durrans writes