Get out and learn more

Edinburgh Napier uses student input to boost satisfaction and outcomes. Jack Grove writes

October 2, 2014

Swapping the lecture hall for the beach on some occasions could significantly improve university teaching, an education chief has suggested.

Mark Huxham, director of academic strategy at Edinburgh Napier University, said that he is encouraging lecturers to hold tutorials and seminars in unconventional places to “break up the monotony and regularity of timetabled teaching”.

Professor Huxham, who oversees his university’s teaching and learning strategy, said that his students had benefited from outings to beaches and Edinburgh’s botanic gardens.

“It was helpful to escape the confines and constraints of the classroom,” said Professor Huxham, who teaches environmental biology.

“You can use different settings to improve teaching by linking parts of the lesson to places you visit,” he explained, saying that the walking-and-talking approach with visual links to the curriculum can be more memorable than classroom-based lessons.

The move to outdoor teaching was also part of Edinburgh Napier’s student-led approach to teaching, in which undergraduates will have a greater say in the way courses are taught and assessed, he added.

“It is an experiment in radical democracy where everything is up for grabs,” he said.

Student input has already been used to revamp one programme on biology and ecology, which was part of a pilot course at the university last year. An end-of-module exam in the programme was replaced by an open-book discursive assessment, in which students were asked to critique a mock journal paper.

The weekly timetable for lectures, seminars and laboratory work on the course was also restructured according to suggestions by the students, with contact hours concentrated on certain days, rather than spread through the week, Professor Huxham said.

“There was a feeling that learning was fragmented, so we looked at what could be done,” he added.

As students were heavily involved in the changes, they would be more forgiving if there were any teething problems in the early stages of the newly designed modules, Professor Huxham argued.

Addressing fears that increased student involvement in course design could lead to accusations that the university was “dumbing down” on standards, Professor Huxham said that students were happy to defer to their teachers’ expertise in many areas of learning.

“They did not choose to change the course content or curriculum as they recognised they weren’t experts in that,” he said.


You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

PhD Scholar in Medicine

University Of Queensland

Manager, Research Systems and Performance

Auckland University Of Technology

Lecturer in Aboriginal Allied Health

University Of South Australia

Lecturer, School of Nursing & Midwifery

Western Sydney University

College General Manager, SHE

La Trobe University
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham