The pursuit of parapsychology

December 24, 1999

Every few years, parapsychologists announce the breakthrough they have all been waiting for - proof that psychic phenomena really exist. And then, over the next few years, they find they cannot reproduce the results.

The situation has been thus since Victorian scientists first tried to inject science into the seance room. There are always those - usually physicists and psychologists - who have wanted to use scientific methods to investigate psychic phenomena, the human ability to communicate with somebody else or their environment using channels not accepted by orthodox science, such as clairvoyance, telepathy, precognition and psychokinesis.

Since Darwin took away the idea that man was created by God, there has been a certain appeal to the notion that there is something inexplicable about human consciousness that has kept us centre-stage. It is a contradictory stance - the desire to retain the mystery yet seek its explanation through science. Nevertheless, in this century some scientists have found success with extremely complex parapsychology experiments carried out under controlled conditions. But, again, problems have arisen in attempts to reproduce the phenomena in more than one laboratory.

As well as scientific exploration, there has always been the popular fascination with parapsychology, encouraged by a media that knows stories about psychic phenomena attract an audience.

The challenge for traditional science is to demonstrate that the world is, in fact, a far more complex and interesting place than we could have ever imagined and to encourage in people a sense of wonder about science rather than the paranormal.

Science cannot prove something does not exist: it can only ask if there is enough evidence to show that it does exist. There is always just enough evidence to convince the people who want to believe, but not enough to convince the sceptics. It is an ambiguous database that is brilliantly borderline. I wonder what would happen to the field if someone proved telepathy was the product of some weird electromagnetic wave and we could fully understand its mechanism. Perhaps the field would disappear overnight because the mystery would have gone.

Richard Wiseman is a reader in psychology at the University of Hertfordshire.

Interview by Steve Farrar

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

James Fryer illustration (27 July 2017)

It is not Luddism to be cautious about destroying an academic publishing industry that has served us well, says Marilyn Deegan

Jeffrey Beall, associate professor and librarian at the University of Colorado Denver

Creator of controversial predatory journals blacklist says some peers are failing to warn of dangers of disreputable publishers

Hand squeezing stress ball
Working 55 hours per week, the loss of research periods, slashed pensions, increased bureaucracy, tiny budgets and declining standards have finally forced Michael Edwards out
Kayaker and jet skiiers

Nazima Kadir’s social circle reveals a range of alternative careers for would-be scholars, and often with better rewards than academia

hole in ground

‘Drastic action’ required to fix multibillion-pound shortfall in Universities Superannuation Scheme, expert warns