Statistically speaking

December 6, 2012

Tim Moore and Woody Caan (Letters, 25 October) describe statistics as a common language, invaluable for pooling knowledge and precise in a world of uncertainties. But if the world of organisations seems opaque, one frequently burdened by nagging doubts, then a common, quantitative language is unlikely to work because personnel employed in such places won't agree on what to add up.

Perhaps they'd have more success in constructing their own linguistic devices: notional statements whose logic helps to investigate and moderately improve unique organisational reality, not least a better understanding of its numerous missions and politics.

Debating such logical statements does not preclude the use of statistics (or other management techniques); however, for any experts and lay people involved, participative learning about the ongoing problem situation is prime.

Neil Richardson, Kirkheaton

You've reached your article limit.

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Daniel Mitchell illustration (29 June 2017)

Academics who think they can do the work of professional staff better than professional staff themselves are not showing the kind of respect they expect from others

celebrate, cheer, tef results

Emilie Murphy calls on those who challenged the teaching excellence framework methodology in the past to stop sharing their university ratings with pride

A podium constructed out of wood

There are good reasons why some big names are missing from our roster

Senior academics at Teesside University put at risk of redundancy as summer break gets under way

Thorns and butterflies

Conditions that undermine the notion of scholarly vocation – relentless work, ubiquitous bureaucracy – can cause academics acute distress and spur them to quit, says Ruth Barcan