On liberty and debate 3

April 14, 2006

Richard Lynn and J. Phillipe Rushton respond as "specialists" to the debate over Frank Ellis (Letters, April 7).

They are correct to point out that studies have found differences between black and white groups in IQ tests, and that there has been much debate about these differences. They allude to work on adoption to support their conclusion that the differences are genetic and state that this has been "accepted for decades by those who have expertise in this subject".

This position is expounded by a small number of psychologists, but it is highly misleading to create the impression that there is some kind of consensus. These findings continue to be hotly debated.

It is vital that these issues are debated, or others may be beguiled by the arguments of Lynn and Rushton.

Tony Ward
Newman College of Higher Education, Birmingham

Already registered?

Sign in now if you are already registered or a current subscriber. Or subscribe for unrestricted access to our digital editions and iPad and iPhone app.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Board Member BOURNEMOUTH UNIVERSITY (MAIN OFFICE)

Most Commented

Elderly woman looking up at sky

A recent paper claims that the quality of researchers declines with age. Five senior scientists consider the data and how they’ve contributed through the years

Otto illustration (5 May 2016)

Craig Brandist on the proletarianisation of a profession and how it leads to behaviours that could hobble higher education

smiley, laugh, happy, funny, silly, face, faces

Scholars should cheer up and learn to take the rough with the smooth, says John Tregoning

Eleanor Shakespeare illustration 19 May 2016

Tim Blackman’s vision of higher education for the 21st century is one in which students of varying abilities learn successfully together

James Minchall illustration (12 May 2016)

An online experiment proves that part of the bill for complying with the Freedom of Information Act is self-inflicted, says Louis Goddard