Leaders need a solid inside knowledge

January 23, 2014

Re “Leading question: scholar or executive?”, News, 16 January. There is a myth that top executives from one field do well in another. For example, it was thought that stuffy engineers were ill-suited to the brave world of maintaining UK railways – much better a bunch of management high-flyers; a few broken rails and fatalities later, we learned differently.

The most successful UK companies often appoint people who know the industry (it’s very rare for someone who is not steeped in retail to get a big job in the retail sector).

The best leaders I have worked for and encountered are those who have the strongest academic records.

The problems in academia, I believe, lie in the career path to the top and the attitude of the governing councils.

A big administrative job is often damaging to an academic career if it comes early; for lab-based scientists, it is in almost every case a one-way ticket: do it and there’s no way back to the old job. Often the people with the right skill set and academic credibility wait too long to climb on the rungs. Sometimes the people who get on early enough to reach the top are classic non-achievers. They fail upwards at one post after another (more accurately they never hold any job long enough for a proper judgement of their acumen; their next job comes simply because they held the previous one).

This relates to governing councils. Most often they have no real knowledge of universities, and they suspect the motives of academics. They can be easily swayed by “experience” and a good manner coupled to some apparently plausible vision that chimes with a position paper or article that they have recently read.

No doubt every Russell Group university (except Oxbridge) intends to be a top five institution. By definition three-quarters will fail, but is anyone sacked for not hitting the mark? And yet, at appointment, the ability of the vice-chancellor-designate to outline this top five vision would have been high in the governing council’s list of criteria.

Jim_sta via timeshighereducation.co.uk


This absurd debate stems from the fact that democratic accountability has been removed from most UK universities.

If academics elected their deans and heads of university, as is the case in most continental European universities, this “discussion” would not even take place because it would be rightly seen as ludicrous.

UK academics do not seem to mind that they are no longer able to elect officers of their universities and do nothing to counter their disenfranchisement.

Paradoxically, academics in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the former “totalitarian” Communist bloc, enjoy a statutory right to elect the officers of their universities.

Jan Culik via timeshighereducation.co.uk

Times Higher Education free 30-day trial

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Post-doctoral Research Associate in Chemistry

University Of Western Australia

PACE Data Support Officer

Macquarie University - Sydney Australia

Associate Lecturer in Nursing

Central Queensland University
See all jobs

Most Commented

women leapfrog. Vintage

Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O’Gorman offer advice on climbing the career ladder

Woman pulling blind down over an eye
Liz Morrish reflects on why she chose to tackle the failings of the neoliberal academy from the outside
White cliffs of Dover

From Australia to Singapore, David Matthews and John Elmes weigh the pros and cons of likely destinations

Mitch Blunt illustration (23 March 2017)

Without more conservative perspectives in the academy, lawmakers will increasingly ignore and potentially defund social science, says Musa al-Gharbi

Michael Parkin illustration (9 March 2017)

Cramming study into the shortest possible time will impoverish the student experience and drive an even greater wedge between research-enabled permanent staff and the growing underclass of flexible teaching staff, says Tom Cutterham