Evidence and insight be damned

In the training of teachers, ministers seem determined to sideline universities with little thought for the consequences

May 2, 2013

Michael Gove is a man in a hurry. Such has been the pace and breadth of his reforms to the schools system that those affected have often barely had time to take stock before he has moved on. Such an approach has not been without political bumps, but the education secretary is admired within his party as someone who gets things done.

Of course, so vigorous a shake-up of schools and the curriculum also affects higher education, and one area in which Gove’s reforming zeal has strayed across the divide is in teacher training, which is of huge importance (not least financially) to the universities involved.

The government wants the emphasis in teacher training to move away from universities and into schools via schemes such as School Direct.

The implication for education departments, and for the universities in which they sit, are assessed in our feature this week.

‘Are we saying that this doesn’t require university engagement?’ one v-c asks. ‘What will happen to the child and the quality of his or her education?’

John Furlong, professor of educational studies at the University of Oxford, argues that education as a discipline is in crisis: “From every quarter, it seems that the contribution of our universities to the field of education is being questioned and diluted.”

This reflects a wider feeling among universities that they are under siege in this area.

Take Ofsted’s inspection of teacher training, in which university provision has long won better ratings than that based in schools (under the 2008-12 Ofsted inspection framework, 46 per cent of all higher education provision was judged to be “outstanding”).

The framework has now changed, and while it is still early days, large providers fear that they will be less likely to secure an “outstanding” rating under the new regime. This matters because Ofsted judgements relate directly to the allocations institutions will receive.

None of this means that universities have suddenly got worse at training teachers, but such changes are adding to the fraught atmosphere within education departments. One gets a sense of the climate from the story (perhaps apocryphal) about the head of one department that was inspected and found no longer to be “outstanding”. She objected to the inspectors on the grounds that her department was at least as good as the one at the university up the road, which still had “outstanding” status.

“Don’t worry,” came the reply, “it soon won’t.”

One vice-chancellor observes that it may be in Gove’s interest for there to be fewer “outstanding” university providers of initial teacher training because this will both release places to and push providers towards School Direct - the employment-based alternative preferred by the Department for Education.

“Any higher education institution judged to be ‘good’ is scheduled to lose 50 per cent of its allocation by 2014-15; any judged to be ‘adequate’ could lose their entire provision,” says the vice-chancellor (adding that they would rather not be identified lest their university be rewarded with a kicking).

The implications are potentially profound: “Are we saying that the training of teachers doesn’t require university engagement or, at best, universities playing [only] a minor role?” the vice-chancellor asks. “And crucially, what will happen to the child and the quality of his or her education? We simply do not know, but we do know that they only go through the educative process in school once.”

john.gill@tsleducation.com

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Reader's comments (5)

What's the stated rationale (pros and cons) for ITT provision in schools rather than universities out of interest?
Louis - I think the governement would say that experienced teachers are the best placed people to train new teachers. But there's suspicion on the other side of the fence that this government just doesn't rate "former teacher training colleges", and sees them to a certain extent as left-wing madrassas. Would be interested to hear others' views on this too though...
Yes, John is right. The evidence is that ITT is better in HEIs, but there is long-standing antagonism to to teacher training in this form from those in power at the moment. So the 'School Direct' is a way of (sort of) cutting out HEIs, only it needs them to work in partnership. So we are now in a messy place. But in my mind there is no doubt that changes are ideologically driven.
Using Ofsted to downgrade university provision is a blatant POLITICAL act, by a body which is meant to be non-political. Ofsted are now so corrupted by their dealings with Gove that I see absolutely no use for them following the election in 2015, of a non-right-wing government. Their roll as an 'inspector' of schools is now secondary to their roll as a para-military provisional wing of the Tory Party. Recently UCET exposed the double-dealings of Sir Michael Wilshaw and Michael Gove, through freedom of information requests, in coordinating press releases to obtain maximum political benefit to the Tory Party. The evidence is clear and unambiguous, the e-mails are blatant and do not try to hide what they are doing. What is shocking is that THIS is allowed to happen in a Parliamentary so-called democracy.
JOHN GILL, Quote: "I think the governement would say that experienced teachers are the best placed people to train new teachers." There is much more to it than that gross simplification. At present a PGCE student spends 70%+ time in a school with 'experienced teachers'. Plus the vast majority of Teacher Educators, involved in Teacher Education in UK HEIs, are themselves 'experienced teachers'. The 'experienced teachers' agenda was filled addressed prior to Gove. Now the suspicion "on the other side of the fence" that this government just doesn't rate "former teacher training colleges", and sees them to a certain extent as "left-wing madrassas" is precisely what is going on. Gove repeatedly calls HEIs Teacher Training Colleges (and the BBC repeat it!) even if we haven't had a Teacher Training College in the UK for over 20 years. The Ofsted report in December 2010 was unambiguous in its support of Teacher Education in HEIs, why now is Ofsted supporting a completely different view less than three years later? It isn't because HEIs have got 'worse', it is all down to the political ideology of one man Michael Gove, supported by his politically appointed lap-dog Sir Michael W.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Most Commented

question marks PhD study

Selecting the right doctorate is crucial for success. Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O'Gorman share top 10 tips on how to pick a PhD

Pencil lying on open diary

Requesting a log of daily activity means that trust between the institution and the scholar has broken down, says Toby Miller

India, UK, flag

Sir Keith Burnett reflects on what he learned about international students while in India with the UK prime minister

Application for graduate job
Universities producing the most employable graduates have been ranked by companies around the world in the Global University Employability Ranking 2016
Construction workers erecting barriers

Directly linking non-EU recruitment to award levels in teaching assessment has also been under consideration, sources suggest