No magic mix

Debates in Contemporary Political Philosophy
May 30, 2003

This volume is a sizeable collection of journal articles and book chapters by some of the most influential political philosophers of recent years. A good range of substantive concerns is addressed, with the essays and extracts grouped around topics that include distributive justice, democracy, nationalism, and citizenship and multiculturalism.

Given the line-up of authors and topics, the volume would appear to be a valuable teaching resource for relatively advanced courses in contemporary political philosophy. Yet, I have certain reservations.

The editors characterise contemporary political philosophy as starting with John Rawls' A Theory of Justice, a work they take to have marked a turn from explanatory to normative theory. Given that the field as thus delineated yields a vast literature, I am not sure why the first four chapters are allocated to topics in the philosophy of social explanation that do not quite fit it.

This is not to deny that students would benefit from reading Steven Lukes' seminal treatment of methodological individualism, or Jon Elster on game theory, for instance, but the editors could have allowed more space for items closer to the heart of contemporary debates in normative political philosophy.

Among contemporary debates students might expect to encounter but will not find here are those dealing with feminist issues, environmental issues, human rights and global justice.

For a volume that professes to show how political philosophy is flourishing and keeping pace with political change beyond the academy, it has a dated feel. This is not because some of the essays were originally published ten years before today's generation of students was born, but because some of the selections are rather backward looking.

The general level of the essays is quite difficult, and students with a sufficiently wide and deep knowledge to benefit may well have reached a stage at which the selections appear restrictive.

In short, while congratulating the editors on putting together a collection in which every item is worth reading, I cannot help thinking that judged purely as a teaching resource the whole does not quite have a value equal to the sum of its parts.

Tim Hayward is reader in politics, University of Edinburgh.

 

Debates in Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Anthology. First edition

Editor - Derek Matravers and Jonathan Pike
ISBN - 0 415 30210 2 and 30211 0
Publisher - Routledge/Open University
Price - £60.00 and £17.99
Pages - 454

You've reached your article limit

Register to continue

Registration is free and only takes a moment. Once registered you can read a total of 6 articles each month, plus:

  • Sign up for the editor's highlights
  • Receive World University Rankings news first
  • Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches
  • Participate in reader discussions and post comments
Register

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Featured Jobs

Most Commented

Doctoral study can seem like a 24-7 endeavour, but don't ignore these other opportunities, advise Robert MacIntosh and Kevin O'Gorman

Matthew Brazier illustration (9 February 2017)

How do you defeat Nazis and liars? Focus on the people in earshot, says eminent Holocaust scholar Deborah Lipstadt

Laurel and Hardy sawing a plank of wood

Working with other academics can be tricky so follow some key rules, say Kevin O'Gorman and Robert MacIntosh

Improvement, performance, rankings, success

Phil Baty sets out why the World University Rankings are here to stay – and why that's a good thing

Warwick vice-chancellor Stuart Croft on why his university reluctantly joined the ‘flawed’ teaching excellence framework