New degree is a 'cheap and inferior con'

Phil Baty reports on fierce debate at Natfhe's annual conference

Foundation degrees are a "con on working-class people", the Natfhe conference agreed.

Delegates threw out parts of a motion that gave a lukewarm welcome to the degrees as a method of widening access. They said the degrees were a ruse to increase numbers on the cheap and would give working-class students an inferior qualification wrongly branded a "degree".

Mary Davis of Natfhe's inner-London region said: "Foundation degrees are training. They are not education. It's a con on working-class people."

Brandishing last week's issue of The THES , which reported plans by 20 corporations to develop their own foundation degrees with public money, she said the degrees would be run by business and would have little academic content.

Mike Farmer of western region, a supporter of the degrees, said: "At an open day at my university, dozens of people came to see about new degrees.

None would have come to the university on our current systems."

Liz Lawrence, a Natfhe national negotiator, asked if students could "go on to do a full degree? Or is it a two-year course that traps people because it is narrowly vocational?"

The foundation degree motion, put by the southern region, was reduced to state: "Any attempt by the government to introduce foundation degrees on the cheap by any levelling down of pay and conditions (or by) seeking to undermine the established philosophy of independent inquiry in higher education will be fiercely resisted."

Already registered?

Sign in now if you are already registered or a current subscriber. Or subscribe for unrestricted access to our digital editions and iPad and iPhone app.

Register to continue  

You've enjoyed reading five THE articles this month. Register now to get five more, or subscribe for unrestricted access.

Most Commented

Universities to scale back liberal arts and social science courses

  • David Humphries illustration (24 September 2015)

A Russell Group tagline rap is further proof that we need to reform the academy’s approach, argues Philip Moriarty

  • World University Rankings

US continues to lose its grip as institutions in Europe up their game

  • World University Rankings 2015-2016 methodology

Change for the better: fuelled by more comprehensive data, the 2015-2016 rankings probe deeper than ever

  • protest, street, march

Even in the academy, your class background will always be a factor in how you are seen, says LSE’s Lisa Mckenzie