Not complacent 1

February 17, 2006

Once again The Times Higher appears to be objecting to the world-beating performance of UK universities in attracting international students ("Complacent staff could lose foreign enrolments", February 10).

It has long been recognised that the quality of our teaching and our support for international students are the most crucial factors in our efforts to attract these students for the benefit of our institutions, our student communities as a whole and the UK more generally.

Most universities routinely consult their international students to assess their satisfaction. The benchmarking project you mention is one example of this. We do it because we believe it to be very important to understand our international students, and our findings are valuable in helping us improve our services. How you translate this into a headline and a story that suggests universities are complacent is beyond comprehension.

David Baker
British Universities International Liaison Association

Already registered?

Sign in now if you are already registered or a current subscriber. Or subscribe for unrestricted access to our digital editions and iPad and iPhone app.

Have your say

Log in or register to post comments

Register to continue  

You've enjoyed reading five THE articles this month. Register now to get five more, or subscribe for unrestricted access.

Most Commented

Globalisation

Times Higher Education World University Rankings data reveal the top 200 most outward-looking institutions

Common cactus finch (Geospiza scandens)

Tiffany Taylor on a thought-provoking view of the forces acting to ensure survival

Stressed businessman answering four telephones

Some surveys show faculty putting in at least 60 hours a week, but research casts doubt on whether this is a productive routine

Student asking question during class

University of Reading research finds link between undergraduate satisfaction and ethnicity of lecturers

Level of quality compass

Authors argue this means universities should spend less on senior academics and give promising younger scholars more of a chance